The lumbosacral angle does not reflect progressive tethered cord syndrome in children with spinal dysraphism

Erwin M. J. Cornips*, Femke G. E. M. Razenberg, Lodewijk W. van Rhijn, Dan L. H. M. Soudant, Elisabeth P. M. van Raak, Jacobiene W. Weber, Simon G. Robben, Johanna M. Fock, Coriene E. Catsman-Berrevoets, Johannes S. H. Vles

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Our goal was to validate the hypothesis that the lumbosacral angle (LSA) increases in children with spinal dysraphism who present with progressive symptoms and signs of tethered cord syndrome (TCS), and if so, to determine for which different types and/or levels the LSA would be a valid indicator of progressive TCS. Moreover, we studied the influence of surgical untethering and eventual retethering on the LSA. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 33 children with spinal dysraphism and 33 controls with medulloblastoma. We measured the LSA at different moments during follow-up and correlated this with progression in symptomatology. LSA measurements had an acceptable intra- and interobserver variability, however, some children with severe deformity of the caudal part of the spinal column, and for obvious reasons those with caudal regression syndrome were excluded. LSA measurements in children with spinal dysraphism were significantly different from the control group (mean LSA change, 21.0A degrees and 3.1A degrees respectively). However, both groups were not age-matched, and when dividing both groups into comparable age categories, we no longer observed a significant difference. Moreover, we did not observe a significant difference between 26 children with progressive TCS as opposed to seven children with stable TCS (mean LSA change, 20.6A degrees and 22.4A degrees respectively). We did not observe significant differences in LSA measurements for children with clinically progressive TCS as opposed to clinically stable TCS. Therefore, the LSA does not help the clinician to determine if there is significant spinal cord tethering, nor if surgical untethering is needed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1757-1764
JournalChild's Nervous System
Volume26
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

Keywords

  • Lumbosacral angle
  • Spinal dysraphism
  • Tethered cord syndrome
  • Untethering

Cite this