The legitimacy of dam development in international watercourses: A case study of the Harirud River Basin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article examines the international legitimacy of unilateral dam development in an international watercourse from the perspective of international water law. Drawing upon technical analysis over the Harirud River Basin, the article discusses probable negative impacts of unilateral dam development in Afghanistan on downstream Iran and Turkmenistan. Competing claims are analyzed to assess emerging transboundary damage under customary international water law. Applying these insights to the case study, this article explores how legal norms and principles can contribute to transboundary water cooperation. It investigates how equitable and reasonable utilization, as required by the United Nations Watercourse Convention, could be reached and whether current activities are in conformity with international norms. Based on this analysis and in the light of international customary law, the article questions the compatibility of unilateral control and capture of water resources in Afghanistan, particularly through the Salma Dam, with ‘equitable and reasonable utilization’ and ‘no significant harm’ rules. The article also argues that building the Salma Dam results in significant transboundary harm to downstream states. Hence, such harm could be considered as significant transboundary damage. Conclusions point to an understanding of water law as a form of institutional guidance in order to provide a transparent setting for transboundary water cooperation among riparian states.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)247-278
Number of pages32
JournalTransnational Environmental Law
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

Keywords

  • Transboundary damage
  • International water law
  • Unilateral dam development
  • Harirud
  • Afghanistan
  • WATER-RESOURCES
  • LAW

Cite this

@article{cb1c52086ffe4b1ab682c56570642b8f,
title = "The legitimacy of dam development in international watercourses: A case study of the Harirud River Basin",
abstract = "This article examines the international legitimacy of unilateral dam development in an international watercourse from the perspective of international water law. Drawing upon technical analysis over the Harirud River Basin, the article discusses probable negative impacts of unilateral dam development in Afghanistan on downstream Iran and Turkmenistan. Competing claims are analyzed to assess emerging transboundary damage under customary international water law. Applying these insights to the case study, this article explores how legal norms and principles can contribute to transboundary water cooperation. It investigates how equitable and reasonable utilization, as required by the United Nations Watercourse Convention, could be reached and whether current activities are in conformity with international norms. Based on this analysis and in the light of international customary law, the article questions the compatibility of unilateral control and capture of water resources in Afghanistan, particularly through the Salma Dam, with ‘equitable and reasonable utilization’ and ‘no significant harm’ rules. The article also argues that building the Salma Dam results in significant transboundary harm to downstream states. Hence, such harm could be considered as significant transboundary damage. Conclusions point to an understanding of water law as a form of institutional guidance in order to provide a transparent setting for transboundary water cooperation among riparian states.",
keywords = "Transboundary damage, International water law, Unilateral dam development, Harirud, Afghanistan, WATER-RESOURCES, LAW",
author = "M. Nagheeby and {Piri Damagh}, Mehdi and Michael Faure",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1017/S2047102519000128",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "247--278",
journal = "Transnational Environmental Law",
issn = "2047-1025",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

The legitimacy of dam development in international watercourses: A case study of the Harirud River Basin. / Nagheeby, M.; Piri Damagh, Mehdi; Faure, Michael.

In: Transnational Environmental Law, Vol. 8, No. 2, 07.2019, p. 247-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The legitimacy of dam development in international watercourses: A case study of the Harirud River Basin

AU - Nagheeby, M.

AU - Piri Damagh, Mehdi

AU - Faure, Michael

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - This article examines the international legitimacy of unilateral dam development in an international watercourse from the perspective of international water law. Drawing upon technical analysis over the Harirud River Basin, the article discusses probable negative impacts of unilateral dam development in Afghanistan on downstream Iran and Turkmenistan. Competing claims are analyzed to assess emerging transboundary damage under customary international water law. Applying these insights to the case study, this article explores how legal norms and principles can contribute to transboundary water cooperation. It investigates how equitable and reasonable utilization, as required by the United Nations Watercourse Convention, could be reached and whether current activities are in conformity with international norms. Based on this analysis and in the light of international customary law, the article questions the compatibility of unilateral control and capture of water resources in Afghanistan, particularly through the Salma Dam, with ‘equitable and reasonable utilization’ and ‘no significant harm’ rules. The article also argues that building the Salma Dam results in significant transboundary harm to downstream states. Hence, such harm could be considered as significant transboundary damage. Conclusions point to an understanding of water law as a form of institutional guidance in order to provide a transparent setting for transboundary water cooperation among riparian states.

AB - This article examines the international legitimacy of unilateral dam development in an international watercourse from the perspective of international water law. Drawing upon technical analysis over the Harirud River Basin, the article discusses probable negative impacts of unilateral dam development in Afghanistan on downstream Iran and Turkmenistan. Competing claims are analyzed to assess emerging transboundary damage under customary international water law. Applying these insights to the case study, this article explores how legal norms and principles can contribute to transboundary water cooperation. It investigates how equitable and reasonable utilization, as required by the United Nations Watercourse Convention, could be reached and whether current activities are in conformity with international norms. Based on this analysis and in the light of international customary law, the article questions the compatibility of unilateral control and capture of water resources in Afghanistan, particularly through the Salma Dam, with ‘equitable and reasonable utilization’ and ‘no significant harm’ rules. The article also argues that building the Salma Dam results in significant transboundary harm to downstream states. Hence, such harm could be considered as significant transboundary damage. Conclusions point to an understanding of water law as a form of institutional guidance in order to provide a transparent setting for transboundary water cooperation among riparian states.

KW - Transboundary damage

KW - International water law

KW - Unilateral dam development

KW - Harirud

KW - Afghanistan

KW - WATER-RESOURCES

KW - LAW

U2 - 10.1017/S2047102519000128

DO - 10.1017/S2047102519000128

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 247

EP - 278

JO - Transnational Environmental Law

JF - Transnational Environmental Law

SN - 2047-1025

IS - 2

ER -