The Italy–Albania Protocol: A new model of border-shifting within the EU and its compatibility with Union law

Andreina De Leo*, Eleonora Celoria

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article critically examines the extraterritorial asylum processing model established by the Italy–Albania deal, arguing that it departs from traditional EU externalization strategies and presents new legal challenges. By analysing the criteria used by the EU Court of Justice to determine whether situations not explicitly regulated by EU law fall within its scope, the article shows that the examination of asylum claims in Albania could trigger the applicability of Union law, despite the territorial limitations of much of EU secondary legislation in the area of asylum. It further explores how this system may undermine the effectiveness and integrity of the CEAS and violate certain provisions of the Charter. The article concludes by advocating for CJEU intervention to clarify the relationship between extraterritorial asylum procedures and EU law, ensuring legal certainty and the consistent application of Union law.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)595-618
Number of pages24
JournalMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024

Keywords

  • externalization
  • extraterritorial asylum processing
  • EU asylum law
  • Italy–Albania Protocol
  • cooperation with third countries

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Italy–Albania Protocol: A new model of border-shifting within the EU and its compatibility with Union law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this