The informational basis of scoring rules

M. Nunez, G. Valletta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We consider voting wherein voters assign a certain score to each of the many available alternatives. We study the normative properties of procedures that aggregate the scores collected in the ballot box. A vast class of ballot aggregators, including procedures based on the pairwise comparison of alternatives, satisfy May’s famous conditions in our framework. We prove that, within such a plethora of procedures, scoring rules are singled out by a property related to their informational basis: in order to determine the winner, they do not take into account the specific distribution of scores chosen by each voter. The result is shown to hold regardless of the introduction of asymmetry among the alternatives.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)279-297
Number of pages19
JournalReview of Economic Design
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

Keywords

  • Scoring rules
  • May's theorem
  • Informational basis
  • MAJORITY-RULE
  • SOCIAL CHOICE

Cite this