Abstract
The economics literature emphasizes the importance of the elasticity of substitution between capital and labour in several economic contexts. However, analyses of the effect of the elasticity of substitution on the direction of technological change are often overlooked. Most assessments of the direction of technological change rely on a Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) production framework. This strand of empirical work considers the elasticity of substitution between capital and labour as a deep and fixed parameter. In this article, we show that the change in the elasticity of substitution that has occurred in recent decades might be an alternative source of change of factor income shares in addition to changes in factor-augmenting technological change. We construct a theoretical environment in which the elasticity of substitution is determined endogenously by the capital share and capital intensity. Rolling window estimates and non-linear estimation methods show that the elasticity of substitution in nine OECD economies observed between 1950 and 2017 was not constant and that, in fact, in the latter half of the 1970s, the elasticity of substitution increased, in the presence of labour-augmenting technical change.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 380-400 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Economics of Innovation and New Technology |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 1 Mar 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- Elasticity of substitution
- factor income shares
- rolling window analysis
- biased technological change
- VARIABLE FACTOR SHARES
- ECONOMIC-GROWTH
- TECHNICAL PROGRESS
- INDUCED INNOVATION
- INDUCED INVENTION
- UNITED-STATES
- DECLINE
- TECHNOLOGY
- MODEL
- LONG