TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of Parkinson’s Disease on adaptive split-belt walking: a muscle synergy analysis
AU - Hulzinga, Femke
AU - D’Cruz, Nicholas
AU - McCrum, Christopher
AU - Ginis, Pieter
AU - Gilat, Moran
AU - Nieuwboer, Alice
PY - 2025/8
Y1 - 2025/8
N2 - Objective: People with Parkinson's disease (PwPD) face challenges in adapting their gait to asymmetrical demands, leading to turning abnormalities. Methods: We investigated the neuromuscular control underlying these adaptive gait difficulties using muscle synergy analysis, including a novel statistical parametric mapping (SPM) approach. We compared 24 PwPD with 27 age-matched controls (HC) during asymmetrical split-belt (SB) and regular tied-belt (TB) walking. Results: Both groups decreased from four to three synergies during TB- versus SB-walking. When only considering the transition back to TB-walking, PwPD were unable to increase their number of synergies as quickly as HC. Assuming four synergies, we compared synergy timing across treadmill phases and groups. We observed phase effects in both legs, but no group-by-phase interactions. The synergy encompassing the tibialis anterior showed abnormal activation in PwPD in the slow leg during SB-walking (post-hoc p < 0.001). Simplified neuromuscular control was related to worse adaptive performance in PwPD (r = -0.52,p = 0.009). Conclusion: Although the number of synergies during adaptive walking was similar between groups, subtle within-synergy changes were apparent in PwPD. Significance: This study is the first to examine the muscle synergies underlying adaptive SB-walking in PwPD, identifying impaired distal muscle activation as a potential fall risk factor in challenging gait situations.
AB - Objective: People with Parkinson's disease (PwPD) face challenges in adapting their gait to asymmetrical demands, leading to turning abnormalities. Methods: We investigated the neuromuscular control underlying these adaptive gait difficulties using muscle synergy analysis, including a novel statistical parametric mapping (SPM) approach. We compared 24 PwPD with 27 age-matched controls (HC) during asymmetrical split-belt (SB) and regular tied-belt (TB) walking. Results: Both groups decreased from four to three synergies during TB- versus SB-walking. When only considering the transition back to TB-walking, PwPD were unable to increase their number of synergies as quickly as HC. Assuming four synergies, we compared synergy timing across treadmill phases and groups. We observed phase effects in both legs, but no group-by-phase interactions. The synergy encompassing the tibialis anterior showed abnormal activation in PwPD in the slow leg during SB-walking (post-hoc p < 0.001). Simplified neuromuscular control was related to worse adaptive performance in PwPD (r = -0.52,p = 0.009). Conclusion: Although the number of synergies during adaptive walking was similar between groups, subtle within-synergy changes were apparent in PwPD. Significance: This study is the first to examine the muscle synergies underlying adaptive SB-walking in PwPD, identifying impaired distal muscle activation as a potential fall risk factor in challenging gait situations.
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110761
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110761
M3 - Article
SN - 1388-2457
VL - 176
JO - Clinical Neurophysiology
JF - Clinical Neurophysiology
M1 - 2110761
ER -