Abstract
Purpose Baselining is a deception detection technique that compares a statement of interest to a baseline. This study focused on verbal baselining: it examined differences in detailedness between the baseline and the statement of interest as a cue to deception.Method Across two experiments, participants watched two crime videos and provided two statements: one truthful baseline and one statement of interest, which was either truthful or deceptive depending on the condition. To manipulate expectations for detail, half of the participants were shown a model statement (i.e., an example of a richly detailed statement) before giving their responses.Results In Experiment 1 (using written statements), both the model statement and the baseline independently improved truth/lie discrimination. In Experiment 2 (using spoken statements), however, these effects were not replicated. Importantly, combining a model statement with baselining did not further improve truth/lie discrimination in either experiment.Conclusion These findings underscore the complexity of verbal lie detection and highlight the need to better understand when and how baselining techniques are most effective.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Legal and Criminological Psychology |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 4 Sept 2025 |
Keywords
- comparable truth baseline
- lie detection
- model statement
- reality monitoring
- verbal cues
- ELICIT INFORMATION
- FANTASY PRONENESS
- SMALL TALK
- CBCA
- CUES
- DECEPTION
- ACCURACY
- DECEIT
- STORY
- AGE