Abstract
Background Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is increasingly used, but this treatment is complex and costly. As clinical outcomes of HSCT with matched unrelated donor (MUD) and haploidentical donors are similar, costs could influence donor choice. Method We retrospectively compared resource utilisation and costs of HSCT using the three different donor types (matched related donor (MRD) (n = 32), haploidentical related (n = 30) and MUD (n = 60)) within the first year after transplantation. Costs were analysed through a bottom-up method. Non-parametric bootstrapping was applied to test for statistical differences in costs. Subgroup analyses were performed to identify predictors for costs. Results Cost pre-transplant for search and acquisition of the graft were significantly higher in MUD HSCT (euro35 222) versus MRD and haploidentical HSCT (euro15 356 and euro16 097 respectively). The costs of haploidentical HSCT were the highest in the transplant phase. Main cost factors were inpatient days and medication. Overall, the costs for haploidentical and MUD HSCT were similar (euro115 724 for MUD, euro113 312 for haploidentical). Conclusion Our study suggests no difference in total transplantation costs between allogeneic HSCT using a MUD or a haploidentical donor. Since clinical outcomes seem similar as well, the choice of donor type might be based on availability, speed and logistics.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 327-335 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | European Journal of Haematology |
Volume | 108 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 13 Jan 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2022 |
Keywords
- cost drivers
- costs
- donor type
- hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- resource utilisation
- POSTTRANSPLANT CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
- OUTCOMES