The Illicit Trade in Antiquitiesis not the World’s Third Largest Illicit Trade: A Critical Evaluation of a Factoid

Donna Yates*, Neil Brodie

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Working paper / PreprintPreprint

Abstract

This paper represents a “stratigraphic excavation”of the assertion that the illicit trade in antiquities is the 3rd largest, second only to arms and narcotics. Through queries into academic, popular media, and policy literature, we document the layers of use and reuse of this factoid, presenting a narrative of its evolution over the past five decades. We find that the assertion is not based on any research ever conducted, any statistics ever collected, and originates with no competent authorities. We conclude that the uncritical repetition of false “facts”undermines legitimate efforts to prevent looting, trafficking, and illicit sale of antiquities.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherSocArXiv
Pages1-11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Nov 2022

Publication series

SeriesSocArXiv Papers

Keywords

  • antiquities
  • antiquities trafficking
  • crime
  • criminal markets
  • cultural property
  • factoid
  • heritage crime
  • heritage policy
  • illicit antiquities
  • looting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Illicit Trade in Antiquitiesis not the World’s Third Largest Illicit Trade: A Critical Evaluation of a Factoid'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this