The global compact for migration: Lessons for the Unity of EU representation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In December 2018, the Global Compact for Migration was first adopted at the Marrakesh intergovernmental conference to be later endorsed as an UN General Assembly Resolution in New York. From an EU perspective, what started out as a common project to manage migration globally, not to say externally, became a fiasco for the unity of EU representation on the international scene. Unlike the negotiations of international agreements which are framed by the procedure set out in Article 218 TFEU, the negotiations of international soft law do not benefit from a clear legal framework. The Court of Justice has given some indications on the procedural and institutional aspects relevant for the negotiations of international soft law instruments in the Council v. Commission (C-660/13) case but many uncertainties remain. The purpose of this article is to draw lessons from the negotiation process of the Global Compact for the unity of EU representation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)194-214
Number of pages21
JournalEuropean Journal of Migration and Law
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 May 2019

Keywords

  • global compact for migration
  • non-legally binding international instrument
  • EU external relations
  • unity of representation
  • principle of sincere cooperation

Cite this

@article{2bd1a43462e642089b919ac1b70d9954,
title = "The global compact for migration: Lessons for the Unity of EU representation",
abstract = "In December 2018, the Global Compact for Migration was first adopted at the Marrakesh intergovernmental conference to be later endorsed as an UN General Assembly Resolution in New York. From an EU perspective, what started out as a common project to manage migration globally, not to say externally, became a fiasco for the unity of EU representation on the international scene. Unlike the negotiations of international agreements which are framed by the procedure set out in Article 218 TFEU, the negotiations of international soft law do not benefit from a clear legal framework. The Court of Justice has given some indications on the procedural and institutional aspects relevant for the negotiations of international soft law instruments in the Council v. Commission (C-660/13) case but many uncertainties remain. The purpose of this article is to draw lessons from the negotiation process of the Global Compact for the unity of EU representation.",
keywords = "global compact for migration, non-legally binding international instrument, EU external relations, unity of representation, principle of sincere cooperation",
author = "Pauline Melin",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1163/15718166-12340047",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "194--214",
journal = "European Journal of Migration and Law",
issn = "1388-364X",
publisher = "Martinus Nijhoff Publishers",
number = "2",

}

The global compact for migration: Lessons for the Unity of EU representation. / Melin, Pauline.

In: European Journal of Migration and Law, Vol. 21, No. 2, 07.05.2019, p. 194-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The global compact for migration: Lessons for the Unity of EU representation

AU - Melin, Pauline

PY - 2019/5/7

Y1 - 2019/5/7

N2 - In December 2018, the Global Compact for Migration was first adopted at the Marrakesh intergovernmental conference to be later endorsed as an UN General Assembly Resolution in New York. From an EU perspective, what started out as a common project to manage migration globally, not to say externally, became a fiasco for the unity of EU representation on the international scene. Unlike the negotiations of international agreements which are framed by the procedure set out in Article 218 TFEU, the negotiations of international soft law do not benefit from a clear legal framework. The Court of Justice has given some indications on the procedural and institutional aspects relevant for the negotiations of international soft law instruments in the Council v. Commission (C-660/13) case but many uncertainties remain. The purpose of this article is to draw lessons from the negotiation process of the Global Compact for the unity of EU representation.

AB - In December 2018, the Global Compact for Migration was first adopted at the Marrakesh intergovernmental conference to be later endorsed as an UN General Assembly Resolution in New York. From an EU perspective, what started out as a common project to manage migration globally, not to say externally, became a fiasco for the unity of EU representation on the international scene. Unlike the negotiations of international agreements which are framed by the procedure set out in Article 218 TFEU, the negotiations of international soft law do not benefit from a clear legal framework. The Court of Justice has given some indications on the procedural and institutional aspects relevant for the negotiations of international soft law instruments in the Council v. Commission (C-660/13) case but many uncertainties remain. The purpose of this article is to draw lessons from the negotiation process of the Global Compact for the unity of EU representation.

KW - global compact for migration

KW - non-legally binding international instrument

KW - EU external relations

KW - unity of representation

KW - principle of sincere cooperation

U2 - 10.1163/15718166-12340047

DO - 10.1163/15718166-12340047

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 194

EP - 214

JO - European Journal of Migration and Law

JF - European Journal of Migration and Law

SN - 1388-364X

IS - 2

ER -