Abstract
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 60-69 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Ecological Economics |
Volume | 125 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2016 |
JEL classifications
- q57 - "Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services; Biodiversity Conservation; Bioeconomics; Industrial Ecology"
Keywords
- Consumption
- Energy economics
- Industrial ecology
- Life cycle assessment
- Rebound effect
- Technological efficiency
- SYSTEM
- LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT
- PERSPECTIVE
- CHOICES
- MODEL
- ENERGY EFFICIENCY
- POLICY
- TECHNOLOGIES
- CONSUMPTION
Access to Document
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The foundations of the environmental rebound effect and its contribution towards a general framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 125, 05.2016, p. 60-69.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - The foundations of the environmental rebound effect and its contribution towards a general framework
AU - Font Vivanco, D.
AU - McDowall, W.
AU - Freire-González, J.
AU - Kemp, R.
AU - van der Voet, E.
N1 - Export Date: 25 May 2016 CODEN: ECECE Correspondence Address: Font Vivanco, D.; Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden UniversityNetherlands; email: [email protected] References: Alcott, B., Jevons' paradox (2005) Ecol. Econ., 54, pp. 9-21; Ayres, R.U., Warr, B., Accounting for growth: the role of physical work (2005) Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn., 16, pp. 181-209; Benedetto, G., Rugani, B., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Rebound effects due to economic choices when assessing the environmental sustainability of wine (2014) Food Policy, 49, pp. 167-173; Berkhout, P.H.G., Muskens, J.C., Velthuijsen, W., Defining the rebound effect (2000) Energy Policy, 28, pp. 425-432; Billari, F.C., Fent, T., Prskawetz, A., Scheffran, J., (2006) Agent-Based Computational Modelling: Applications in Demography, Social, Economic and Environmental Sciences, , Springer Science & Business Media; Binswanger, M., Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? (2001) Ecol. Econ., 36, pp. 119-132; Brookes, L., The greenhouse effect: the fallacies in the energy efficiency solution (1990) Energy Policy, 18, pp. 199-201; Chitnis, M., Sorrell, S., Druckman, A., Firth, S.K., Jackson, T., Who rebounds most? Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for different UK socioeconomic groups (2014) Ecol. Econ., 106, pp. 12-32; Cleveland, C.J., Hall, C.A., Kaufmann, R., Energy and the US economy: a biophysical perspective (1986) Science, 225, pp. 890-897; Cleveland, C.J., Kaufmann, R.K., Stern, D.I., Aggregation and the role of energy in the economy (2000) Ecol. Econ., 32, pp. 301-317; Dace, E., Bazbauers, G., Berzina, A., Davidsen, P.I., System dynamics model for analyzing effects of eco-design policy on packaging waste management system (2014) Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 87, pp. 175-190; de Haan, P., Identification, quantification, and containment of energy-efficiency induced rebound effects: a research agenda (2008) Rebound research report 1, , Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, IED-Institute for Environmental Decisions, NSSI-Natural and Social Science Interface; de Haan, P., Mueller, M.G., Peters, A., Does the hybrid Toyota Prius lead to rebound effects? Analysis of size and number of cars previously owned by Swiss Prius buyers (2005) Ecol. Econ., 58, pp. 592-605; Environmental indicators: typology and overview (1999) Technical report No 25, , European Environment Agency; Ekvall, T., Cleaner production tools: LCA and beyond (2002) J. Clean. Prod., 10, pp. 403-406; Elzen, B., Geels, F.W., Green, K., (2004) System innovation and the transition to sustainability: theory, evidence and policy, , Edward Elgar Publishing; Faber, A., Frenken, K., Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy: towards an evolutionary environmental economics (2009) Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 76, pp. 462-470; Font Vivanco, D., van der Voet, E., The rebound effect through industrial ecology's eyes: a review of LCA-based studies (2014) Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 19, pp. 1933-1947; Font Vivanco, D., Freire-González, J., Kemp, R., van der Voet, E., The remarkable environmental rebound effect of electric cars: a microeconomic approach (2014) Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, pp. 12063-12072; Font Vivanco, D., Kemp, R., van der Voet, E., The relativity of eco-innovation: environmental rebound effects from past transport innovations in Europe (2015) J. Clean. Prod., 101, pp. 71-85; Freire-González, J., Methods to empirically estimate direct and indirect rebound effect of energy-saving technological changes in households. Ecological modelling-can we break the addiction to fossil energy? (2011) Special Issue, 7th Biennial International Workshop Advances in Energy Studies, Barcelona, Spain, 19-21 October 2010, pp. 32-40; Friedrichsmeier, T., Matthies, E., Rebound effects in energy efficiency-an inefficient debate? (2015) GAIA, 24 (2), pp. 80-84; Frondel, M., Peters, J., Vance, C., Fuel efficiency and automobile travel in Germany: don't forget the rebound effect (2009) Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Consumption: the Rebound Effect, pp. 47-68. , Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK, H. Herring, S. Sorrell (Eds.); Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., Another view of development, ecological degradation, and north-south trade (1998) Rev. Soc. Econ., 56, pp. 20-36; Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., The Jevons Paradox: the evolution of complex adaptive systems and the challenge for scientific analysis (2008) The Jevons Paradox and the Myth of Resource Efficiency Improvements, pp. 79-140; Girod, B., de Haan, P., GHG reduction potential of changes in consumption patterns and higher quality levels: Evidence from Swiss household consumption survey (2009) Energy Policy, 37, pp. 5650-5661; Girod, B., Haan, P., Scholz, R., Consumption-as-usual instead of ceteris paribus assumption for demand (2011) Int J Life Cycle Assess, pp. 3-11. , Springer-Verlag; Goedkoop, M., Van Halen, C., te Riele, H., Rommens, P., Product service systems, ecological and economic basics (1999) Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, Communications Directorate; Greening, A., Greene, D.L., Difiglio, C., Energy efficiency and consumption-the rebound effect-a survey (2000) Energy Policy, 28, pp. 389-401; Guinée, J.B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Zamagni, A., Masoni, P., Buonamici, R., Ekvall, T., Rydberg, T., Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future (2010) Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, pp. 90-96; Guinée, J.B., (2002) Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards, , Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Hertwich, E.G., Consumption and the rebound effect: an industrial ecology perspective (2005) J. Ind. Ecol., 9, pp. 85-98; Hicks, A., Theis, T., An agent based approach to the potential for rebound resulting from evolution of residential lighting technologies (2014) Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 19, pp. 370-376; Hicks, A.L., Theis, T.L., Zellner, M.L., Emergent effects of residential lighting choices: prospects for energy savings (2015) J. Ind. Ecol., 19, pp. 285-295; Hillman, K., (2008) Environmental Assessment and Strategic Technology Choice: The Case of Renewable Transport Fuels, , Thesis report, Department of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology; Hofstetter, P., Madjar, M., Linking change in happiness, time-use, sustainable consumption, and environmental impacts; an attempt to understand time-rebound effects (2003) Final report to the Society for Non-Traditional Technology, , Japan/BAO & Consultrix, Zurich; Hymel, K.M., Small, K.A., Van Dender, K., Induced demand and rebound effects in road transport (2010) Transp. Res. B Methodol., 44, pp. 1220-1241; Jackson, T., (2005) Motivating Sustainable Consumption: A Review of Evidence on Consumer Behaviour and Behavioural Change: A Report to the Sustainable Development Research Network, , Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey; Jalas, M., A time use perspective on the materials intensity of consumption (2002) Ecol. Econ., 41, pp. 109-123; Jenkins, J., Nordhaus, T., Shellenberger, M., (2011) Energy Emergence: Rebound and Backfire as Emergent Phenomena, , Breakthrough Institute; Jevons, W.S., (1865) The Coal Question. An Inquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation and the Probable Exhaustion of our Coal-Mines, , Macmillan and co., Cambridge, United Kingdom; Jones, H.G., (1975) An Introduction to Modern Theories of Economic Growth, , Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd., UK; Khazzoom, J.D., Economic implications of mandated efficiency in standards for household appliances (1980) Energy J., 1, pp. 21-40; Kushnir, D., Sandén, B.A., Multi-level energy analysis of emerging technologies: a case study in new materials for lithium ion batteries (2011) J. Clean. Prod., 19, pp. 1405-1416; Lovins, A.B., Energy saving resulting from the adoption of more efficient appliances: another view (1988) Energy J., pp. 155-162; Madjar, M., Ozawa, T., Happiness and sustainable consumption: psychological and physical rebound effects at work in a tool for sustainable design (2006) Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 11, pp. 105-115; Matthews, H.S., Lifset, R., The life-cycle assessment and industrial ecology communities (2007) J. Ind. Ecol., 11, pp. 1-4; Maxwell, D., Owen, P., McAndrew, L., Muehmel, K., Neubauer, A., (2011) Addressing the Rebound Effect: A report for the European Commission DG Environment; Miller, S.A., Keoleian, G.A., Framework for analyzing transformative technologies in life cycle assessment (2015) Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, pp. 3067-3075; Mizobuchi, K., An empirical study on the rebound effect considering capital costs (2008) Energy Econ., 30, pp. 2486-2516; Murray, C.K., What if consumers decided to all 'go green'? Environmental rebound effects from consumption decisions (2013) Energy Policy, 54, pp. 240-256; Nässén, J., Holmberg, J., Quantifying the rebound effects of energy efficiency improvements and energy conserving behaviour in Sweden (2009) Energy Effic., 2, pp. 221-231; Plepys, A., The grey side of ICT (2002) Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 22, pp. 509-523; Rajagopal, D., Hochman, G., Zilberman, D., Indirect fuel use change (IFUC) and the lifecycle environmental impact of biofuel policies (2011) Energy Policy, 39, pp. 228-233; Ruzzenenti, F., Basosi, R., The rebound effect: an evolutionary perspective (2008) Ecol. Econ., 67, pp. 526-537; Sala-i-Martin, X., (2002) 15 Years of New Growth Economics: What Have We Learnt?, , Department of Economics Discussion Papers, C. University (Ed.); Sandén, B., Karlstrom, M., Positive and negative feedback in consequential life-cycle assessment (2007) J. Clean. Prod., 15, pp. 1469-1481; Santarius, T., Green Growth Unravelled (2012) How Rebound Effects Baffle Sustainability Targets When the Economy Keeps Growing, , Heinrich Boell Foundation and Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Berlin; Saunders, H.D., The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth (1992) Energy J., pp. 131-148; Saunders, H.D., A calculator for energy consumption changes arising from new technologies (2005) Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy, p. 5; Schaefer, S., Wickert, C., The efficiency paradox in organization and management theory (2015) The 4th European Theory Development Workshop, , Cardiff, UK; Small, K.A., Van Dender, K., Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: the declining rebound effect (2007) Energy J., pp. 25-51; Sorrell, S., The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency (2007) Project Report; Sorrell, S., Dimitropoulos, J., (2007) UKERC Review of Evidence for the Rebound Effect: Technical Report 5-Energy Productivity and Economic Growth Studies, , UK Energy Research Centre, London; Spielmann, M., de Haan, P., Scholz, R.W., Environmental rebound effects of high-speed transport technologies: a case study of climate change rebound effects of a future underground maglev train system (2008) J. Clean. Prod., 16, pp. 1388-1398; Takahashi, K.I., Tatemichi, H., Tanaka, T., Nishi, S., Kunioka, T., Environmental impact of information and communication technologies including rebound effects. Electronics and the Environment, 2004 (2004) 2004 IEEE International Symposium on, pp. 13-16. , Conference Record; Takase, K., Kondo, Y., Washizu, A., An analysis of sustainable consumption by the waste input-output model (2005) J. Ind. Ecol., 9, pp. 201-219; Turner, K., Negative rebound and disinvestment effects in response to an improvement in energy efficiency in the UK economy (2009) Energy Econ., 31, pp. 648-666; van den Bergh, J.J.M., Energy conservation more effective with rebound policy (2011) Environ. Resour. Econ., 48, pp. 43-58; Walnum, H., Aall, C., Løkke, S., Can rebound effects explain why sustainable mobility has not been achieved? (2014) Sustainability, 6, pp. 9510-9537; Weidema, B., Thrane, M., Comments on the development of harmonized method for sustainability assessment of technologies (SAT) (2007) Paper presented at Sustainability Assessment of Technologies, Brussels, Belgium; Weidema, B.P., Wesnaes, J., Hermansen, J., Kristensen, T., Halberg, N., (2008) Environmental Improvement Potentials of Meat and Dairy Products, , JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, Luxembourg, P. Eder, L. Delgado (Eds.); Wirl, F., (1997) The Economics of Conservation Programs, , Kluwer Academics Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Woersdorfer, J.S., Consumer needs and their satiation properties as drivers of the rebound effect: the case of energy-efficient washing machines (2010) Papers on Economics and Evolution 1016, , Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik
PY - 2016/5
Y1 - 2016/5
N2 - The study of the so-called rebound effect has traditionally pertained to the domain of neoclassical energy economics. In recent years, other disciplines have applied this concept in the context of the environmental assessment of products and policies, and multiple perspectives have unfolded more or less in parallel. Among these, the environmental rebound effect (ERE) perspective, focused on efficiency changes and indicators that go beyond energy to multiple environmental issues, has remained relatively unnoticed. This article thus asks the following questions: What are the foundational aspects of the ERE and how these relate to other perspectives? Are there irreconcilable differences between perspectives? And what is the value of the ERE towards a general framework? We map the fundamental ideas behind the ERE and find that the lack of articulation has resulted in inconsistent usage and lack of clarity. We also argue that the ERE offers many valuable insights for rebound assessment, such as the study of broader efficiency changes and of innovations aimed at tackling multiple environmental issues. Perhaps most importantly, the ERE helps bringing together the existing rebound perspectives, as its application shows that it is both possible and valuable to articulate broader definitions for the rebound effect. © 2016 Elsevier B.V.
AB - The study of the so-called rebound effect has traditionally pertained to the domain of neoclassical energy economics. In recent years, other disciplines have applied this concept in the context of the environmental assessment of products and policies, and multiple perspectives have unfolded more or less in parallel. Among these, the environmental rebound effect (ERE) perspective, focused on efficiency changes and indicators that go beyond energy to multiple environmental issues, has remained relatively unnoticed. This article thus asks the following questions: What are the foundational aspects of the ERE and how these relate to other perspectives? Are there irreconcilable differences between perspectives? And what is the value of the ERE towards a general framework? We map the fundamental ideas behind the ERE and find that the lack of articulation has resulted in inconsistent usage and lack of clarity. We also argue that the ERE offers many valuable insights for rebound assessment, such as the study of broader efficiency changes and of innovations aimed at tackling multiple environmental issues. Perhaps most importantly, the ERE helps bringing together the existing rebound perspectives, as its application shows that it is both possible and valuable to articulate broader definitions for the rebound effect. © 2016 Elsevier B.V.
KW - Consumption
KW - Energy economics
KW - Industrial ecology
KW - Life cycle assessment
KW - Rebound effect
KW - Technological efficiency
KW - SYSTEM
KW - LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT
KW - PERSPECTIVE
KW - CHOICES
KW - MODEL
KW - ENERGY EFFICIENCY
KW - POLICY
KW - TECHNOLOGIES
KW - CONSUMPTION
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.006
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.006
M3 - Article
SN - 0921-8009
VL - 125
SP - 60
EP - 69
JO - Ecological Economics
JF - Ecological Economics
ER -