The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA): short-term effects

H. de Vries*, A.N. Mudde, S.P.J. Kremers, J.J.L. Wetzels, E. Uiters, C. Ariza, P.D. Vitória, A. Fielder, K. Holm, K. Jansen, R. Lehtovuori, M.J.J.M. Candel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

42 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA) resulted in a smoking prevention project for six European countries. It included activities on four levels: adolescents, schools, parents and out-of-school activities. Common goals and objectives were developed, but countries were also able to include additional objectives. National diversities required country-specific methods. The most important common element was a school-based programme consisting of at least five lessons paying attention to social influence processes and training in refusal skills. During the first year, significantly more smoking prevention activities were realized in experimental schools compared with control schools. Not all countries had the same number of lessons on resisting peer pressures. Significant cognitive changes were observed in Spain, resulting in more negative attitudes, increased self-efficacy levels and a more negative intention towards smoking in the experimental group. Counter-productive cognitive effects were observed in the UK. Significantly less onset of weekly smoking in experimental groups was found in Finland (4.7%) and Spain (3.1%). Counter-productive effects were observed in Denmark and the UK. In conclusion, while having common objectives, the ESFA approach allowed for a great deal of diversity. Fundamental research using dismantling designs is needed to be able to detect the most effective elements of smoking prevention programmes for different age groups. Attention to parenting styles and practices is also needed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)649-663
JournalHealth Education Research
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2003

Cite this