The essential elements of a risk governance framework for current and future nanotechnologies

V. Stone, M. Führer, P.H. Feindt, H. Bouwmeester, I. Linkov, S. Sabella, F. Murphy, K. Bizer, L. Tran, M. Agerstrand, C. Fito, T. Andersen, D. Anderson, E. Bergamaschi, J.W. Cherrie, S. Cowan, J.-F. Dalemcourt, Michael Faure, S. Gabbert, A. GajewiczT.F. Fernandes, D. Hristozov, H.J. Johnston, T.C. Lansdown, S. Linder, H.J.P. Marvin, M. Mullins, K.P. Purnhagen, T. Puzyn, A. Sanchez Jimenez, J.J. Scott-Fordsmand, G. Streftaris, M. van Tongeren, N.H. Voelcker, G. Voyiatzis, S.N. Yannopoulos, P.M. Poortvliet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Societies worldwide are investing considerable resources into the safe development and use of nanomaterials. Although each of these protective efforts is crucial for governing the risks of nanomaterials, they are insufficient in isolation. What is missing is a more integrative governance approach that goes beyond legislation. Development of this approach must be evidence based and involve key stakeholders to ensure acceptance by end users. The challenge is to develop a framework that coordinates the variety of actors involved in nanotechnology and civil society to facilitate consideration of the complex issues that occur in this rapidly evolving research and development area. Here, we propose three sets of essential elements required to generate an effective risk governance framework for nanomaterials. (1) Advanced tools to facilitate risk-based decision making, including an assessment of the needs of users regarding risk assessment, mitigation, and transfer. (2) An integrated model of predicted human behavior and decision making concerning nanomaterial risks. (3) Legal and other (nano-specific and general) regulatory requirements to ensure compliance and to stimulate proactive approaches to safety. The implementation of such an approach should facilitate and motivate good practice for the various stakeholders to allow the safe and sustainable future development of nanotechnology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1321-1331
Number of pages11
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume38
Issue number7
Early online date14 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

Keywords

  • decison making
  • nano-regulation
  • risk communication
  • risk governance
  • risk management
  • EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
  • LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT
  • MANUFACTURED NANOMATERIALS
  • DECISION-ANALYSIS
  • MANAGEMENT
  • Decision making
  • NANOPARTICLES
  • NANOSAFETY
  • SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
  • CYTOTOXICITY
  • COMMUNICATION

Cite this

Stone, V., Führer, M., Feindt, P. H., Bouwmeester, H., Linkov, I., Sabella, S., ... Poortvliet, P. M. (2018). The essential elements of a risk governance framework for current and future nanotechnologies. Risk Analysis, 38(7), 1321-1331. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12954
Stone, V. ; Führer, M. ; Feindt, P.H. ; Bouwmeester, H. ; Linkov, I. ; Sabella, S. ; Murphy, F. ; Bizer, K. ; Tran, L. ; Agerstrand, M. ; Fito, C. ; Andersen, T. ; Anderson, D. ; Bergamaschi, E. ; Cherrie, J.W. ; Cowan, S. ; Dalemcourt, J.-F. ; Faure, Michael ; Gabbert, S. ; Gajewicz, A. ; Fernandes, T.F. ; Hristozov, D. ; Johnston, H.J. ; Lansdown, T.C. ; Linder, S. ; Marvin, H.J.P. ; Mullins, M. ; Purnhagen, K.P. ; Puzyn, T. ; Sanchez Jimenez, A. ; Scott-Fordsmand, J.J. ; Streftaris, G. ; van Tongeren, M. ; Voelcker, N.H. ; Voyiatzis, G. ; Yannopoulos, S.N. ; Poortvliet, P.M. / The essential elements of a risk governance framework for current and future nanotechnologies. In: Risk Analysis. 2018 ; Vol. 38, No. 7. pp. 1321-1331.
@article{1c21bf4f2c5d42ef8b850ca6964d797a,
title = "The essential elements of a risk governance framework for current and future nanotechnologies",
abstract = "Societies worldwide are investing considerable resources into the safe development and use of nanomaterials. Although each of these protective efforts is crucial for governing the risks of nanomaterials, they are insufficient in isolation. What is missing is a more integrative governance approach that goes beyond legislation. Development of this approach must be evidence based and involve key stakeholders to ensure acceptance by end users. The challenge is to develop a framework that coordinates the variety of actors involved in nanotechnology and civil society to facilitate consideration of the complex issues that occur in this rapidly evolving research and development area. Here, we propose three sets of essential elements required to generate an effective risk governance framework for nanomaterials. (1) Advanced tools to facilitate risk-based decision making, including an assessment of the needs of users regarding risk assessment, mitigation, and transfer. (2) An integrated model of predicted human behavior and decision making concerning nanomaterial risks. (3) Legal and other (nano-specific and general) regulatory requirements to ensure compliance and to stimulate proactive approaches to safety. The implementation of such an approach should facilitate and motivate good practice for the various stakeholders to allow the safe and sustainable future development of nanotechnology.",
keywords = "decison making, nano-regulation, risk communication, risk governance, risk management, EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT, MANUFACTURED NANOMATERIALS, DECISION-ANALYSIS, MANAGEMENT, Decision making, NANOPARTICLES, NANOSAFETY, SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY, CYTOTOXICITY, COMMUNICATION",
author = "V. Stone and M. F{\"u}hrer and P.H. Feindt and H. Bouwmeester and I. Linkov and S. Sabella and F. Murphy and K. Bizer and L. Tran and M. Agerstrand and C. Fito and T. Andersen and D. Anderson and E. Bergamaschi and J.W. Cherrie and S. Cowan and J.-F. Dalemcourt and Michael Faure and S. Gabbert and A. Gajewicz and T.F. Fernandes and D. Hristozov and H.J. Johnston and T.C. Lansdown and S. Linder and H.J.P. Marvin and M. Mullins and K.P. Purnhagen and T. Puzyn and {Sanchez Jimenez}, A. and J.J. Scott-Fordsmand and G. Streftaris and {van Tongeren}, M. and N.H. Voelcker and G. Voyiatzis and S.N. Yannopoulos and P.M. Poortvliet",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/risa.12954",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "1321--1331",
journal = "Risk Analysis",
issn = "0272-4332",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

Stone, V, Führer, M, Feindt, PH, Bouwmeester, H, Linkov, I, Sabella, S, Murphy, F, Bizer, K, Tran, L, Agerstrand, M, Fito, C, Andersen, T, Anderson, D, Bergamaschi, E, Cherrie, JW, Cowan, S, Dalemcourt, J-F, Faure, M, Gabbert, S, Gajewicz, A, Fernandes, TF, Hristozov, D, Johnston, HJ, Lansdown, TC, Linder, S, Marvin, HJP, Mullins, M, Purnhagen, KP, Puzyn, T, Sanchez Jimenez, A, Scott-Fordsmand, JJ, Streftaris, G, van Tongeren, M, Voelcker, NH, Voyiatzis, G, Yannopoulos, SN & Poortvliet, PM 2018, 'The essential elements of a risk governance framework for current and future nanotechnologies', Risk Analysis, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1321-1331. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12954

The essential elements of a risk governance framework for current and future nanotechnologies. / Stone, V.; Führer, M.; Feindt, P.H.; Bouwmeester, H.; Linkov, I.; Sabella, S.; Murphy, F.; Bizer, K.; Tran, L.; Agerstrand, M.; Fito, C.; Andersen, T.; Anderson, D.; Bergamaschi, E.; Cherrie, J.W.; Cowan, S.; Dalemcourt, J.-F.; Faure, Michael; Gabbert, S.; Gajewicz, A.; Fernandes, T.F.; Hristozov, D.; Johnston, H.J.; Lansdown, T.C.; Linder, S.; Marvin, H.J.P.; Mullins, M.; Purnhagen, K.P.; Puzyn, T.; Sanchez Jimenez, A.; Scott-Fordsmand, J.J.; Streftaris, G.; van Tongeren, M.; Voelcker, N.H.; Voyiatzis, G.; Yannopoulos, S.N.; Poortvliet, P.M.

In: Risk Analysis, Vol. 38, No. 7, 07.2018, p. 1321-1331.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The essential elements of a risk governance framework for current and future nanotechnologies

AU - Stone, V.

AU - Führer, M.

AU - Feindt, P.H.

AU - Bouwmeester, H.

AU - Linkov, I.

AU - Sabella, S.

AU - Murphy, F.

AU - Bizer, K.

AU - Tran, L.

AU - Agerstrand, M.

AU - Fito, C.

AU - Andersen, T.

AU - Anderson, D.

AU - Bergamaschi, E.

AU - Cherrie, J.W.

AU - Cowan, S.

AU - Dalemcourt, J.-F.

AU - Faure, Michael

AU - Gabbert, S.

AU - Gajewicz, A.

AU - Fernandes, T.F.

AU - Hristozov, D.

AU - Johnston, H.J.

AU - Lansdown, T.C.

AU - Linder, S.

AU - Marvin, H.J.P.

AU - Mullins, M.

AU - Purnhagen, K.P.

AU - Puzyn, T.

AU - Sanchez Jimenez, A.

AU - Scott-Fordsmand, J.J.

AU - Streftaris, G.

AU - van Tongeren, M.

AU - Voelcker, N.H.

AU - Voyiatzis, G.

AU - Yannopoulos, S.N.

AU - Poortvliet, P.M.

PY - 2018/7

Y1 - 2018/7

N2 - Societies worldwide are investing considerable resources into the safe development and use of nanomaterials. Although each of these protective efforts is crucial for governing the risks of nanomaterials, they are insufficient in isolation. What is missing is a more integrative governance approach that goes beyond legislation. Development of this approach must be evidence based and involve key stakeholders to ensure acceptance by end users. The challenge is to develop a framework that coordinates the variety of actors involved in nanotechnology and civil society to facilitate consideration of the complex issues that occur in this rapidly evolving research and development area. Here, we propose three sets of essential elements required to generate an effective risk governance framework for nanomaterials. (1) Advanced tools to facilitate risk-based decision making, including an assessment of the needs of users regarding risk assessment, mitigation, and transfer. (2) An integrated model of predicted human behavior and decision making concerning nanomaterial risks. (3) Legal and other (nano-specific and general) regulatory requirements to ensure compliance and to stimulate proactive approaches to safety. The implementation of such an approach should facilitate and motivate good practice for the various stakeholders to allow the safe and sustainable future development of nanotechnology.

AB - Societies worldwide are investing considerable resources into the safe development and use of nanomaterials. Although each of these protective efforts is crucial for governing the risks of nanomaterials, they are insufficient in isolation. What is missing is a more integrative governance approach that goes beyond legislation. Development of this approach must be evidence based and involve key stakeholders to ensure acceptance by end users. The challenge is to develop a framework that coordinates the variety of actors involved in nanotechnology and civil society to facilitate consideration of the complex issues that occur in this rapidly evolving research and development area. Here, we propose three sets of essential elements required to generate an effective risk governance framework for nanomaterials. (1) Advanced tools to facilitate risk-based decision making, including an assessment of the needs of users regarding risk assessment, mitigation, and transfer. (2) An integrated model of predicted human behavior and decision making concerning nanomaterial risks. (3) Legal and other (nano-specific and general) regulatory requirements to ensure compliance and to stimulate proactive approaches to safety. The implementation of such an approach should facilitate and motivate good practice for the various stakeholders to allow the safe and sustainable future development of nanotechnology.

KW - decison making

KW - nano-regulation

KW - risk communication

KW - risk governance

KW - risk management

KW - EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES

KW - LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT

KW - MANUFACTURED NANOMATERIALS

KW - DECISION-ANALYSIS

KW - MANAGEMENT

KW - Decision making

KW - NANOPARTICLES

KW - NANOSAFETY

KW - SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY

KW - CYTOTOXICITY

KW - COMMUNICATION

U2 - 10.1111/risa.12954

DO - 10.1111/risa.12954

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 1321

EP - 1331

JO - Risk Analysis

JF - Risk Analysis

SN - 0272-4332

IS - 7

ER -

Stone V, Führer M, Feindt PH, Bouwmeester H, Linkov I, Sabella S et al. The essential elements of a risk governance framework for current and future nanotechnologies. Risk Analysis. 2018 Jul;38(7):1321-1331. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12954