TY - JOUR
T1 - The EORTC 22922/10925 trial investigating regional nodal irradiation in stage I-III breast cancer
T2 - Outcomes according to locoregional and systemic therapies
AU - Kaidar-Person, Orit
AU - Boersma, Liesbeth
AU - De Brouwer, Peter
AU - Weltens, Caroline
AU - Kirkove, Carine
AU - Peignaux-Casasnovas, Karine
AU - Budach, Volker
AU - van der Leij, Femke
AU - Peters, Max
AU - Weidner, Nicola
AU - Rivera, Sofia
AU - van Tienhoven, Geertjan
AU - Fourquet, Alain
AU - Noel, Georges
AU - Valli, Mariacarla
AU - Guckenberger, Matthias
AU - Koiter, Eveline
AU - Racadot, Severine
AU - Abdah-Bortnyak, Roxolyana
AU - Bartelink, Harry
AU - Struikmans, Henk
AU - Fortpied, Catherine
AU - Poortmans, Philip M
AU - EORTC Radiation Oncology and Breast Cancer Groups
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - The EORTC 22922/10925 trial aimed to investigate the impact on overall survival (OS) of elective internal mammary and medial supraclavicular (IM-MS) radiation therapy (RT) in breast cancer stage I–III. Surgery for the primary tumour and axillary lymph nodes, chest wall RT, boost RT after whole breast RT in breast conserving therapy (BCT), RT to operated axilla, and systemic therapy were per physician's preference. The aim of the current analysis is to assess breast cancer outcomes according to different locoregional and systemic therapy used in the trial. Material/Methods: Data with a median follow-up of 15.7 years were extracted from the trial's case report forms. Kaplan-Meier curves of disease-free and OS and cumulative incidence curves of breast cancer events were produced. An exploratory analysis of the effect of the type of locoregional and systemic therapy on breast cancer outcomes was conducted using the Cox model or the Fine & Gray model accounting for competing risks, both models being adjusted for baseline patient and disease characteristics and treatment. The significance level was set at 5 %, 2-sided. Results: Of the 4,004 patients included, 625 (16%) did not receive any postoperative systemic therapy, 1,185 (30%) received endocrine therapy only, 994 (25%) chemotherapy only, and 1,200 (30%) both chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, without differences between the randomisation arms. Administration and type of therapy was associated with age, menopausal status, clinical T- and N-stage and ER status (p < 0.0001). Local control was better with mastectomy (with/without postmastectomy RT) as compared to BCT, but mastectomy was associated with more distant metastasis (DM) as first event. Similarly, DM as first event occurred more in the BCT group that received a boost as compared to no boost and in those who received RT to the lower axillary level. IM-MS RT reduced significantly regional recurrences and improved disease-free survival in a sensitivity stratified analysis. OS was worse with mastectomy as compared to BCT and with irradiation of the axilla but better with sentinel node dissection and adjuvant combined chemo and hormonal therapy. Conclusion: Different components of therapy influenced the site of first event. IM-MS RT improved outcomes in different breast cancer outcomes were most probably related that the group were balanced due to the trial arms and stratification methods.
AB - The EORTC 22922/10925 trial aimed to investigate the impact on overall survival (OS) of elective internal mammary and medial supraclavicular (IM-MS) radiation therapy (RT) in breast cancer stage I–III. Surgery for the primary tumour and axillary lymph nodes, chest wall RT, boost RT after whole breast RT in breast conserving therapy (BCT), RT to operated axilla, and systemic therapy were per physician's preference. The aim of the current analysis is to assess breast cancer outcomes according to different locoregional and systemic therapy used in the trial. Material/Methods: Data with a median follow-up of 15.7 years were extracted from the trial's case report forms. Kaplan-Meier curves of disease-free and OS and cumulative incidence curves of breast cancer events were produced. An exploratory analysis of the effect of the type of locoregional and systemic therapy on breast cancer outcomes was conducted using the Cox model or the Fine & Gray model accounting for competing risks, both models being adjusted for baseline patient and disease characteristics and treatment. The significance level was set at 5 %, 2-sided. Results: Of the 4,004 patients included, 625 (16%) did not receive any postoperative systemic therapy, 1,185 (30%) received endocrine therapy only, 994 (25%) chemotherapy only, and 1,200 (30%) both chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, without differences between the randomisation arms. Administration and type of therapy was associated with age, menopausal status, clinical T- and N-stage and ER status (p < 0.0001). Local control was better with mastectomy (with/without postmastectomy RT) as compared to BCT, but mastectomy was associated with more distant metastasis (DM) as first event. Similarly, DM as first event occurred more in the BCT group that received a boost as compared to no boost and in those who received RT to the lower axillary level. IM-MS RT reduced significantly regional recurrences and improved disease-free survival in a sensitivity stratified analysis. OS was worse with mastectomy as compared to BCT and with irradiation of the axilla but better with sentinel node dissection and adjuvant combined chemo and hormonal therapy. Conclusion: Different components of therapy influenced the site of first event. IM-MS RT improved outcomes in different breast cancer outcomes were most probably related that the group were balanced due to the trial arms and stratification methods.
KW - Axilla
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Internal mammary
KW - Radiation
KW - Radiotherapy
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110563
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110563
M3 - Article
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 201
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
M1 - 110563
ER -