Abstract
The current status of applied clinical prediction modeling is poor. Many models are developed with suboptimal methods and are not evaluated, and hence have little impact on clinical care. We review 12 challenges-provocatively labeled enemies-that jeopardize the creation of prediction models that make it to clinical practice to improve treatment decisions and clinical outcomes for individual patients. The challenges cover four areas: context, data, design and analysis, and scientific culture. We provide negative examples and recommendations for improvement, but also highlight positive examples and developments. Greater awareness of the complexities surrounding clinical prediction modeling is needed among researchers, funding agencies, health professionals as end users, and all of us as potential patients. To improve the utility of prediction models for healthcare and society, we need fewer but better models as well as more resources for model validation, impact assessment, and implementation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 465-492 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 9 Mar 2026 |
Keywords
- clinical prediction models
- methodology
- model development
- external validation
- impact studies
- model deployment
- DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEMS
- LEARNING-METHODS
- MISSING DATA
- RISK
- BIAS
- VALIDATION
- CARE
- GENERALIZABILITY
- IMPLEMENTATION
- SELECTION
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Enemies of Reliable and Useful Clinical Prediction Models: A Review of Statistical and Scientific Challenges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver