The effects of prehabilitation versus usual care to reduce postoperative complications in high-risk patients with colorectal cancer or dysplasia scheduled for elective colorectal resection: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Annefleur E. M. Berkel*, Bart C. Bongers, Marie-Janne S. van Kamp, Hayke Kotte, Paul Weltevreden, Frans H. C. de Jongh, Michiel M. M. Eijsvogel, A. N. Machteld Wymenga, Marloes Bigirwamungu-Bargeman, Job van der Palen, Marc J. van Det, Nico L. U. van Meeteren, Joost M. Klaase

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Of all older patients that opt for elective colorectal surgery, approximately one-third has one or more postoperative complications, particularly those patients with a low cardiorespiratory fitness (ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) < 11 mL/kg/min). A physical exercise training program prior to surgery (prehabilitation) can improve their cardiorespiratory fitness. It remains to be seen whether prehabilitation also reduces postoperative complications, as most of the studies so far were rather underpowered, heterogeneous, and biased toward selection of patients with a lower risk of postoperative complications. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of a three-week prehabilitation program on 30-day postoperative complications in patients with a VAT < 11 mL/kg/min planned for elective colorectal resection for colorectal cancer or dysplasia. Methods: In this multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial, patients >= 60 years with colorectal cancer or dysplasia grade I, II, or III, planned for elective colorectal resection in two hospitals in the Netherlands, will be recruited. Eligible patients must have a score <= 7 metabolic equivalents on the veterans-specific activity questionnaire, and should be able to perform a cardiopulmonary exercise test. A total of 86 patients will be randomized (block-stratified randomization) to prehabilitation (intervention group) or usual care (control group). For final inclusion, VAT should be < 11 mL/kg/min. Three times a week for 3 weeks, a 60-min supervised prehabilitation session will be completed in community physical therapy practices by the 43 patients in the prehabilitation group, consisting of moderate-to-high intensity interval training to improve cardiorespiratory fitness, and resistance training to improve peripheral muscle strength. Additionally, patients perform home exercises twice a week on a moderate intensity level. The 43 patients in the usual care group will receive usual care. Discussion: Optimizing preoperative physical fitness may decrease the postoperative complication rate, may lead to fewer reoperations, less intense clinical care, a shorter length of stay, a more effective surgical planning (processoptimization), fewer readmissions, less intense rehabilitation, shorter rehabilitation period, earlier resumption of work, enhance patient perceived health-related quality of life, and promote performance in daily life. Costeffectiveness should therefore be expected and evaluated.
Original languageEnglish
Article number29
Number of pages14
JournalBMC Gastroenterology
Volume18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Feb 2018

Keywords

  • Colorectal surgery
  • Cardiorespiratory fitness
  • Ventilatory anaerobic threshold
  • Prehabilitation
  • Physical therapy
  • Exercise training
  • Postoperative complications
  • Physical functioning/fitness
  • QUALITY-OF-LIFE
  • PHYSICAL STATUS CLASSIFICATION
  • SAMPLE-SIZE CALCULATIONS
  • MAJOR ABDOMINAL-SURGERY
  • AORTIC-ANEURYSM REPAIR
  • ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD
  • ELDERLY-PATIENTS
  • OLDER-PEOPLE
  • DISCHARGE INSTITUTIONALIZATION
  • PERIOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of prehabilitation versus usual care to reduce postoperative complications in high-risk patients with colorectal cancer or dysplasia scheduled for elective colorectal resection: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this