The effects of a change in market abuse regulation on abnormal returns and volumes: Evidence from the Amsterdam stock market

T. Prevoo, B.J. ter Weel*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The Market Abuse Directive came into effect on 1 October 2005. One of its purposes is to reduce illegal insider trading and leakage of information prior to official releases by increasing penalties. Applying an event study approach to a dataset of almost 5,000 corporate news announcements, the analysis reveals that the information value of announcements, measured by the announcement day abnormal return and abnormal volume, is not significantly different after the new regulation than it was before although the number of releases has increased significantly. Trading suspicious of illegal insider trading and leakage of information, measured in terms of cumulative average abnormal returns and volumes for the 30 days prior to the news announcement, has significantly declined for small capitalization firms, for announcements containing information about alliances and mergers and acquisitions and for firms in the technology sector.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)237-293
Number of pages57
JournalDe Economist
Volume158
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2010

Keywords

  • Market abuse
  • Insider trading
  • REGULATION FAIR DISCLOSURE
  • TRADING VOLUME
  • INFORMATION
  • ANNOUNCEMENTS
  • EVENT
  • EXCHANGE
  • PRICE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of a change in market abuse regulation on abnormal returns and volumes: Evidence from the Amsterdam stock market'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this