The effect of polygenic risk score and childhood adversity on transdiagnostic symptom dimensions at first-episode psychosis: evidence for an affective pathway to psychosis

Luis Alameda, Victoria Rodriguez, Marta Di Forti, Edoardo Spinazzola, Giulia Trotta, Celso Arango, Manuel Arrojo, Miguel Bernardo, Julio Bobes, Lieuwe de Haan, Cristina Marta Del-Ben, Charlotte Gayer-Anderson, Lucia Sideli, Peter B Jones, James B Kirkbride, Caterina La Cascia, Giada Tripoli, Laura Ferraro, Daniele La Barbera, Antonio LasalviaSarah Tosato, Pierre-Michel Llorca, Paulo Rossi Menezes, Jim van Os, Bart P Rutten, Jose Luis Santos, Julio Sanjuán, Jean-Paul Selten, Andrei Szöke, Ilaria Tarricone, Andrea Tortelli, Eva Velthorst, Hannah E Jongsma, Evangelos Vassos, Diego Quattrone, Robin M Murray, Monica Aas*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Childhood adversity is associated with various clinical dimensions in psychosis; however, how genetic vulnerability shapes the adversity-associated psychopathological signature is yet to be studied. We studied data of 583 First Episode Psychosis (FEP) cases from the EU-GEI FEP case-control study, including Polygenic risk scores for major depressive disorder (MDD-PRS), bipolar disorder (BD-PRS) and schizophrenia (SZ-PRS); childhood adversity measured with the total score of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ); and positive, negative, depressive and manic psychopathological domains from a factor model of transdiagnostic dimensions. Genes and environment interactions were explored as a departure from a multiplicative effect of PRSs and total CTQ on each dimension. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, 10 PCA, site of recruitment and for medication. A childhood adversity and PRS multiplicative interaction was observed between A) the CTQ and MDD-PRS on the predominance of positive (β = 0.42, 95% CI = [0.155, 0.682], p = 0.004); and depressive (β = 0.33, 95% CI = [0.071, 0.591], p = 0.013) dimensions; B) between the CTQ and BD-PRS on the positive dimension (β = 0.45, 95% CI = [0.106, 0.798], p = 0.010), and C) with the CTQ and SZ-PRS on the positive dimension (β = −0.34, 95% CI = [−0.660, −0.015], p = 0.040). Bonferroni corrected p-value of significance was set at 0.0125. In conclusion, despite being underpowered, this study suggests that genetic liability for MDD and BD may have a moderating effect on the sensibility of childhood adversity on depressive and positive psychotic dimensions. This supports the hypothesis of an affective pathway to psychosis in those exposed to childhood adversity.

Original languageEnglish
Article number454
Number of pages7
JournalTranslational Psychiatry
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Female
  • Male
  • Multifactorial Inheritance
  • Psychotic Disorders/genetics psychology
  • Adverse Childhood Experiences/psychology
  • Adult
  • Bipolar Disorder/genetics psychology
  • Depressive Disorder, Major/genetics
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Schizophrenia/genetics
  • Genetic Predisposition to Disease
  • Young Adult
  • Gene-Environment Interaction
  • Adolescent
  • Risk Factors
  • Middle Aged
  • Genetic Risk Score

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of polygenic risk score and childhood adversity on transdiagnostic symptom dimensions at first-episode psychosis: evidence for an affective pathway to psychosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this