Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The effect of means-tested social transfers on labour supply: Heads versus spouses - an empirical analysis of work disincentives in the kyrgyz republic

Research output: Working paper / PreprintWorking paper

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper empirically estimates potential work disincentives of a means-tested social transfer in the Kyrgyz Republic for adults with different household positions. Using data from the Kyrgyz Integrated Household Survey 2012, the analysis compares labour market outcomes for household heads and spouses. Binary response models and quasi-experimental methods are applied to assess the effect of the Monthly Benefit for Poor Families with Children (MBPF) on labour supply. The analysis indicates that overall beneficiaries have on average higher labour market participation rates when compared to non-beneficiaries, but they are more exposed to seasonal effects. Results differ when analysing different household members separately. Household heads in beneficiary households are less likely to be economically active than similar non-beneficiaries. Yet, spouses are more likely to be economically active. However, the effects differ depending on whether the household is located in the South or the North of the country.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationMaastricht
PublisherUNU-MERIT
Publication statusPublished - 19 May 2016

Publication series

SeriesUNU-MERIT Working Papers
Number030
ISSN1871-9872

JEL classifications

  • i38 - "Welfare and Poverty: Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs"
  • j22 - Time Allocation and Labor Supply

Keywords

  • social transfers
  • work disincentives
  • Kyrgyz Republic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of means-tested social transfers on labour supply: Heads versus spouses - an empirical analysis of work disincentives in the kyrgyz republic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this