The effect of audit market structure on audit quality and audit pricing in the private-client market

Jeroen van Raak*, Erik Peek, Roger Meuwissen, Caren Schelleman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study examines whether audit market structure affects audit quality and audit pricing. We analyze two conceptually distinct dimensions of market structure: audit market concentration and client mobility. Focusing on the private-client segment of the Belgian audit market, we compare the pricing and quality effects of market structure between the segment of small and medium-sized (SME) clients and the segment of large clients to test how audit complexity moderates such effects. We find that market concentration impairs price and quality competition in the SME-client segment. Market concentration is unrelated to audit quality in the large-client segment, where we argue that concentration is endogenous to audit complexity. Furthermore, we find that client mobility stimulates price competition in both segments but improves audit quality only in the large-client segment. We interpret our findings as evidence that (a) audit market concentration impairs competition especially when audits have low complexity and that (b) the large-client market segment, characterized by higher audit complexity and higher market concentration, can also be price and quality competitive if clients are sufficiently mobile, and change auditors relatively frequently.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages33
JournalJournal of Business Finance & Accounting
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Nov 2019

Keywords

  • audit fees
  • audit quality
  • competition
  • market structure
  • L11
  • L13
  • M42
  • NONAUDIT SERVICES
  • EARNINGS MANAGEMENT
  • DISCRETIONARY ACCRUALS
  • LITIGATION RISK
  • BIG 4
  • INDEPENDENCE
  • COMPETITION
  • FEES
  • FIRM
  • SELECTION

Cite this

@article{e2a4bb5e4d22464ab70847cb2ef0f7d7,
title = "The effect of audit market structure on audit quality and audit pricing in the private-client market",
abstract = "This study examines whether audit market structure affects audit quality and audit pricing. We analyze two conceptually distinct dimensions of market structure: audit market concentration and client mobility. Focusing on the private-client segment of the Belgian audit market, we compare the pricing and quality effects of market structure between the segment of small and medium-sized (SME) clients and the segment of large clients to test how audit complexity moderates such effects. We find that market concentration impairs price and quality competition in the SME-client segment. Market concentration is unrelated to audit quality in the large-client segment, where we argue that concentration is endogenous to audit complexity. Furthermore, we find that client mobility stimulates price competition in both segments but improves audit quality only in the large-client segment. We interpret our findings as evidence that (a) audit market concentration impairs competition especially when audits have low complexity and that (b) the large-client market segment, characterized by higher audit complexity and higher market concentration, can also be price and quality competitive if clients are sufficiently mobile, and change auditors relatively frequently.",
keywords = "audit fees, audit quality, competition, market structure, L11, L13, M42, NONAUDIT SERVICES, EARNINGS MANAGEMENT, DISCRETIONARY ACCRUALS, LITIGATION RISK, BIG 4, INDEPENDENCE, COMPETITION, FEES, FIRM, SELECTION",
author = "{van Raak}, Jeroen and Erik Peek and Roger Meuwissen and Caren Schelleman",
note = "data source:",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1111/jbfa.12414",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Business Finance & Accounting",
issn = "0306-686X",
publisher = "Wiley",

}

The effect of audit market structure on audit quality and audit pricing in the private-client market. / van Raak, Jeroen; Peek, Erik; Meuwissen, Roger; Schelleman, Caren.

In: Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 19.11.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of audit market structure on audit quality and audit pricing in the private-client market

AU - van Raak, Jeroen

AU - Peek, Erik

AU - Meuwissen, Roger

AU - Schelleman, Caren

N1 - data source:

PY - 2019/11/19

Y1 - 2019/11/19

N2 - This study examines whether audit market structure affects audit quality and audit pricing. We analyze two conceptually distinct dimensions of market structure: audit market concentration and client mobility. Focusing on the private-client segment of the Belgian audit market, we compare the pricing and quality effects of market structure between the segment of small and medium-sized (SME) clients and the segment of large clients to test how audit complexity moderates such effects. We find that market concentration impairs price and quality competition in the SME-client segment. Market concentration is unrelated to audit quality in the large-client segment, where we argue that concentration is endogenous to audit complexity. Furthermore, we find that client mobility stimulates price competition in both segments but improves audit quality only in the large-client segment. We interpret our findings as evidence that (a) audit market concentration impairs competition especially when audits have low complexity and that (b) the large-client market segment, characterized by higher audit complexity and higher market concentration, can also be price and quality competitive if clients are sufficiently mobile, and change auditors relatively frequently.

AB - This study examines whether audit market structure affects audit quality and audit pricing. We analyze two conceptually distinct dimensions of market structure: audit market concentration and client mobility. Focusing on the private-client segment of the Belgian audit market, we compare the pricing and quality effects of market structure between the segment of small and medium-sized (SME) clients and the segment of large clients to test how audit complexity moderates such effects. We find that market concentration impairs price and quality competition in the SME-client segment. Market concentration is unrelated to audit quality in the large-client segment, where we argue that concentration is endogenous to audit complexity. Furthermore, we find that client mobility stimulates price competition in both segments but improves audit quality only in the large-client segment. We interpret our findings as evidence that (a) audit market concentration impairs competition especially when audits have low complexity and that (b) the large-client market segment, characterized by higher audit complexity and higher market concentration, can also be price and quality competitive if clients are sufficiently mobile, and change auditors relatively frequently.

KW - audit fees

KW - audit quality

KW - competition

KW - market structure

KW - L11

KW - L13

KW - M42

KW - NONAUDIT SERVICES

KW - EARNINGS MANAGEMENT

KW - DISCRETIONARY ACCRUALS

KW - LITIGATION RISK

KW - BIG 4

KW - INDEPENDENCE

KW - COMPETITION

KW - FEES

KW - FIRM

KW - SELECTION

U2 - 10.1111/jbfa.12414

DO - 10.1111/jbfa.12414

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Business Finance & Accounting

JF - Journal of Business Finance & Accounting

SN - 0306-686X

ER -