The effect of 3% and 6% hypertonic saline in viral bronchiolitis: a randomised controlled trial

J. Teunissen*, A.H.J. Hochs, A. Vaessen-Verberne, A.L.M. Boehmer, C.C.J.M. Smeets, H. Brackel, R. van Gent, J. Wesseling, D. Logtens-Stevens, R. de Moor, P.P.R. Rosias, S. Potgieter, M.R. Faber, H.J.E. Hendriks, M.L.G. Janssen-Heijnen, B.F. Loza

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Bronchiolitis is a common disorder in young children that often results in hospitalisation. Except for a possible effect of nebulised hypertonic saline (sodium chloride), no evidence-based therapy is available. This study investigated the efficacy of nebulised 3% and 6% hypertonic saline compared with 0.9% hypertonic saline in children hospitalised with viral bronchiolitis. In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial, children hospitalised with acute viral bronchiolitis were randomised to receive either nebulised 3%, 6% hypertonic saline or 0.9% normal saline during their entire hospital stay. Salbutamol was added to counteract possible bronchial constriction. The primary endpoint was the length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were need for supplemental oxygen and tube feeding. From the 292 children included in the study (median age 3.4 months), 247 completed the study. The median length of hospital stay did not differ between the groups: 69 h (interquartile range 57), 70 h (IQR 69) and 53 h (IQR 52), for 3% (n=84) and 6% (n=83) hypertonic saline and 0.9% (n=80) normal saline, respectively, (p=0.29). The need for supplemental oxygen or tube feeding did not differ significantly. Adverse effects were similar in the three groups. Nebulisation with hypertonic saline (3% or 6% sodium chloride) although safe, did not reduce the length of stay in hospital, duration of supplemental oxygen or tube feeding in children hospitalised with moderate-to-severe viral bronchiolitis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)913-921
JournalEuropean Respiratory Journal
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Cite this