The Difference Between Self-Reported and Perceived Survey Measures and the Implications for Political Socialization Research

Joris Boonen*, Ellen Quintelier, Marc Hooghe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Within research on the political influence that social network members exert on one another, some studies rely on information obtained directly from different members in the network separately (self-reported measures), while others rely on information obtained from one key informant within the social network (measures based on perception). We investigate the difference between these self-reported and perceived measures by analyzing the correspondence of voting intentions within the family. On the one hand, we examine this correspondence using information obtained from only one family member. On the other hand, we use the self-reported measures obtained from all family members separately. We use data from the Parent-Child Socialization Study (PCSS), a survey conducted among 2,085 mothers, fathers and children in the Flemish region of Belgium (2012). Our analyses suggest that using perceptual measures could lead researchers to different or even opposite conclusions than using self-reported measures from all individual respondents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)367-378
Number of pages12
JournalPolitical Science Research and Methods
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • INTERGENERATIONAL TRANSMISSION
  • NETWORKS
  • PARENTS
  • CONSEQUENCES
  • ATTRIBUTION
  • GENERATIONS
  • ENGAGEMENT
  • FAMILY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Difference Between Self-Reported and Perceived Survey Measures and the Implications for Political Socialization Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this