The diagnostic accuracy of PTSD assessment instruments used in older adults: a systematic review

Demi C. D. Havermans, Estelle M. N. Coeur, O. Jiaqing, Colton S. Rippey, Joan M. Cook, Miranda Olff, Chris Hoeboer, Sjacko Sobczak, Karen A. Lawrence*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review article peer-review

Abstract

Background: As the number of older adults increases worldwide, understanding their mental health is crucial, including the impact of traumatic experiences that can lead to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, validated screening and diagnostic instruments for PTSD in older adults are limited.Objective: We sought to provide a comprehensive summary of the diagnostic accuracy of PTSD screening and diagnostic instruments used in older adults (Mage >= 60 years).Method: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases was conducted for January 1980 through 10 January 2025. Studies that focused on the psychometric properties of PTSD instruments in older adults were included.Results: Out of 21,197 publications screened, only 40 studies including 24 instruments met the eligibility criteria. Only seven were conducted with participants from the general population or primary care patient samples. There were 14 relevant studies in the last ten years, with only six based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria. Validation studies conducted in non-Western and/or non-English speaking older adult samples are rare.Conclusions: There is a shortage of validation studies of PTSD screening and diagnostic tools in the general older adult population. We recommend using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 in clinical practice. It is the gold standard for assessing current and lifetime PTSD in the general population. Further research is required to establish evidence-based clinical cut-off scores and cross-cultural validity for PTSD screening in different populations of older adults. Future studies should also assess measures that consider the multimorbidity in this population (e.g. cognitive impairment and other psychiatric or medical disorders) and are easy to administer in clinical practice.Antecedentes: A medida que aumenta el n & uacute;mero de adultos mayores en todo el mundo, es crucial comprender su salud mental, incluido el impacto de las experiencias traum & aacute;ticas que pueden conducir al trastorno de estr & eacute;s postraum & aacute;tico (TEPT). Sin embargo, los instrumentos validados de tamizaje y diagn & oacute;stico para el TEPT en adultos mayores son limitados.Objetivo: El objetivo de esta revisi & oacute;n sistem & aacute;tica es proporcionar un resumen exhaustivo de la precisi & oacute;n diagn & oacute;stica de los instrumentos de tamizaje y diagn & oacute;stico del TEPT utilizados en adultos mayores (edad M >= 60 a & ntilde;os).M & eacute;todo: Se realiz & oacute; una b & uacute;squeda sistem & aacute;tica en las bases de datos MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO y Web of Science desde enero de 1980 hasta el 10 de enero de 2025. Se incluyeron todos los estudios centrados en las propiedades psicom & eacute;tricas de los instrumentos de TEPT en adultos mayores.Resultados: De las 21.197 publicaciones examinadas, s & oacute;lo 40 estudios que inclu & iacute;an 24 instrumentos cumpl & iacute;an los criterios de selecci & oacute;n. S & oacute;lo siete se realizaron con participantes de la poblaci & oacute;n general o muestras de pacientes de atenci & oacute;n primaria. Hubo 14 estudios relevantes en los & uacute;ltimos diez a & ntilde;os, y s & oacute;lo seis se basaron en los criterios del Manual Diagn & oacute;stico y Estad & iacute;stico de los Trastornos Mentales - Quinta Edici & oacute;n (DSM-5). Los estudios de validaci & oacute;n realizados en muestras de adultos mayores no occidentales y/o de habla no inglesa son escasos.Conclusiones: Hay una escasez de estudios de validaci & oacute;n de herramientas de tamizaje y diagn & oacute;stico de TEPT en la poblaci & oacute;n general de adultos mayores. Recomendamos utilizar la Escala de TEPT administrada por el cl & iacute;nico para el DSM-5 en la pr & aacute;ctica cl & iacute;nica. Es el gold standard para evaluar el TEPT actual y a lo largo de la vida en la poblaci & oacute;n general. Se requiere m & aacute;s investigaci & oacute;n para establecer puntuaciones de corte cl & iacute;nicas basadas en la evidencia y la validez transcultural para la detecci & oacute;n del TEPT en diferentes poblaciones de adultos mayores. Los estudios futuros tambi & eacute;n deber & iacute;an evaluar medidas que tengan en cuenta la multimorbilidad en esta poblaci & oacute;n (por ejemplo, deterioro cognitivo y otros trastornos psiqui & aacute;tricos o m & eacute;dicos) y que sean f & aacute;ciles de administrar en la pr & aacute;ctica cl & iacute;nica.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2498191
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Journal of Psychotraumatology
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • PTSD
  • older adults
  • diagnostic accuracy
  • assessment
  • TEPT
  • adultos mayores
  • precisi & oacute
  • n diagn & oacute
  • stica
  • evaluaci & oacute
  • n
  • POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER
  • CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS
  • SELF-RATING INVENTORY
  • WORLD-WAR-II
  • EVENT SCALE
  • PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
  • LIFETIME PREVALENCE
  • TRAUMATIC EVENTS
  • CHECKLIST
  • IMPACT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The diagnostic accuracy of PTSD assessment instruments used in older adults: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this