The continued need for animals to advance brain research

Judith R Homberg*, Roger A H Adan, Natalia Alenina, Antonis Asiminas, Michael Bader, Tom Beckers, Denovan P Begg, Arjan Blokland, Marilise E Burger, Gertjan van Dijk, Ulrich L M Eisel, Ype Elgersma, Bernhard Englitz, Antonio Fernandez-Ruiz, Carlos P Fitzsimons, Anne-Marie van Dam, Peter Gass, Joanes Grandjean, Robbert Havekes, Marloes J A G HenckensChristiane Herden, Roelof A Hut, Wendy Jarrett, Kate Jeffrey, Daniela Jezova, Andries Kalsbeek, Maarten Kamermans, Martien J Kas, Nael Nadif Kasri, Amanda J Kiliaan, Sharon M Kolk, Aniko Korosi, S Mechiel Korte, Tamas Kozicz, Steven A Kushner, Kirk Leech, Klaus-Peter Lesch, Heidi Lesscher, Paul J Lucassen, Anita Luthi, Liya Ma, Anne S Mallien, Peter Meerlo, Jorge F Mejias, Frank J Meye, Anna S Mitchell, Joram D Mul, Umberto Olcese, Azahara Oliva González, Jocelien D A Olivier, Massimo Pasqualetti, Cyriel M A Pennartz, Piotr Popik, Jos Prickaerts, Liset M de la Prida, Sidarta Ribeiro, Benno Roozendaal, Janine I Rossato, Ali-Akbar Salari, Regien G Schoemaker, August B Smit, Louk J M J Vanderschuren, Tomonori Takeuchi, Rixt van der Veen, Marten P Smidt, Vladyslav V Vyazovskiy, Maximilian Wiesmann, Corette J Wierenga, Bella Williams, Ingo Willuhn, Markus Wöhr, Monique Wolvekamp, Eddy A van der Zee, Lisa Genzel*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

120 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Policymakers aim to move toward animal-free alternatives for scientific research and have introduced very strict regulations for animal research. We argue that, for neuroscience research, until viable and translational alternatives become available and the value of these alternatives has been proven, the use of animals should not be compromised.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2374-2379
Number of pages6
JournalNeuron
Volume109
Issue number15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Aug 2021

Cite this