Abstract
This article critically examines the interpretation of the concept of arbitrability under the New York Convention. Taking stock of divergent interpretations that pose challenges to achieving a uniform enforcement regime, the article proposes a pragmatic approach to interpreting arbitrability under the New York Convention, which seeks to minimize judicial interference and enhance the efficiency of enforcement procedures. By promoting the principle of Kompetenz-Kompetenz and advocating for greater transparency in public policy defences, this article contributes to the ongoing discussion on these issues. It aims to bridge jurisdictional divides by offering a harmonized interpretation of arbitrability that not only illuminates the theoretical underpinning of the concept, but also provides a roadmap for a more coherent and universally applicable interpretation. This will enhance predictability and efficiency in resolving cross-border disputes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | JOIA2024016 |
| Pages (from-to) | 345-370 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Journal of International Arbitration |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2024 |
Keywords
- arbitrability
- enforcement
- harmonization
- jurisdiction
- Kompetenz-Kompetenz
- New York Convention
- public policy
- validity