The Concept of Arbitrability under the New York Convention: The Quest for Comprehensive Reform

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article critically examines the interpretation of the concept of arbitrability under the New York Convention. Taking stock of divergent interpretations that pose challenges to achieving a uniform enforcement regime, the article proposes a pragmatic approach to interpreting arbitrability under the New York Convention, which seeks to minimize judicial interference and enhance the efficiency of enforcement procedures. By promoting the principle of Kompetenz-Kompetenz and advocating for greater transparency in public policy defences, this article contributes to the ongoing discussion on these issues. It aims to bridge jurisdictional divides by offering a harmonized interpretation of arbitrability that not only illuminates the theoretical underpinning of the concept, but also provides a roadmap for a more coherent and universally applicable interpretation. This will enhance predictability and efficiency in resolving cross-border disputes.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberJOIA2024016
Pages (from-to)345-370
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of International Arbitration
Volume41
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2024

Keywords

  • arbitrability
  • enforcement
  • harmonization
  • jurisdiction
  • Kompetenz-Kompetenz
  • New York Convention
  • public policy
  • validity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Concept of Arbitrability under the New York Convention: The Quest for Comprehensive Reform'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this