The classification of recovered memories: A cautionary note

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Traditionally, recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) have been classified as those emerging spontaneously versus those surfacing during the course of suggestive therapy. There are indications that reinterpretation of memories might be a third route to recovered memories. Thus, recovered memories do not form a homogeneous category. Nevertheless, the conceptual distinctions between the various types of recovered memories remain difficult for researchers and clinicians. With this in mind, the current study explored whether recovered memories can be reliably classified. We found that classification is rather problematic in a subset of cases. To reduce potential bias, we urge for the development and subsequent use of a more reliable classification system and multiple expert raters in research on recovered memories.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1640-1643
JournalConsciousness and Cognition
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

Cite this

@article{b1ab391dee91449fb67938029fc6a701,
title = "The classification of recovered memories: A cautionary note",
abstract = "Traditionally, recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) have been classified as those emerging spontaneously versus those surfacing during the course of suggestive therapy. There are indications that reinterpretation of memories might be a third route to recovered memories. Thus, recovered memories do not form a homogeneous category. Nevertheless, the conceptual distinctions between the various types of recovered memories remain difficult for researchers and clinicians. With this in mind, the current study explored whether recovered memories can be reliably classified. We found that classification is rather problematic in a subset of cases. To reduce potential bias, we urge for the development and subsequent use of a more reliable classification system and multiple expert raters in research on recovered memories.",
author = "L. Raymaekers and T. Smeets and M.J.V. Peters and H.P. Otgaar and H. Merckelbach",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.concog.2012.09.002",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "1640--1643",
journal = "Consciousness and Cognition",
issn = "1053-8100",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

The classification of recovered memories: A cautionary note. / Raymaekers, L.; Smeets, T.; Peters, M.J.V.; Otgaar, H.P.; Merckelbach, H.

In: Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 21, No. 4, 01.01.2012, p. 1640-1643.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The classification of recovered memories: A cautionary note

AU - Raymaekers, L.

AU - Smeets, T.

AU - Peters, M.J.V.

AU - Otgaar, H.P.

AU - Merckelbach, H.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Traditionally, recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) have been classified as those emerging spontaneously versus those surfacing during the course of suggestive therapy. There are indications that reinterpretation of memories might be a third route to recovered memories. Thus, recovered memories do not form a homogeneous category. Nevertheless, the conceptual distinctions between the various types of recovered memories remain difficult for researchers and clinicians. With this in mind, the current study explored whether recovered memories can be reliably classified. We found that classification is rather problematic in a subset of cases. To reduce potential bias, we urge for the development and subsequent use of a more reliable classification system and multiple expert raters in research on recovered memories.

AB - Traditionally, recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) have been classified as those emerging spontaneously versus those surfacing during the course of suggestive therapy. There are indications that reinterpretation of memories might be a third route to recovered memories. Thus, recovered memories do not form a homogeneous category. Nevertheless, the conceptual distinctions between the various types of recovered memories remain difficult for researchers and clinicians. With this in mind, the current study explored whether recovered memories can be reliably classified. We found that classification is rather problematic in a subset of cases. To reduce potential bias, we urge for the development and subsequent use of a more reliable classification system and multiple expert raters in research on recovered memories.

U2 - 10.1016/j.concog.2012.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.concog.2012.09.002

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 1640

EP - 1643

JO - Consciousness and Cognition

JF - Consciousness and Cognition

SN - 1053-8100

IS - 4

ER -