Abstract
The regulation and communication of risk have changed significantly over the past 20 years or so, partially as a result of a number of regulatory scandals in Europe and elsewhere, which have led to greater public distrust of regulators and policy-makers. This increase in public distrust has resulted in a phasing-out of consensual-style regulation, and the emergence of a newer model of regulation based on variables including public participation, transparency and increasingly powerful non-governmental organisations (NGOs). This paper discusses some of the consequences of adopting this new model of regulation through a series of case studies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 409-429 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Journal of Risk Research |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2011 |
Keywords
- AMPLIFICATION
- COMMUNITY
- DEBATE
- Europe
- FOOD COLORINGS
- Gardasil
- PERCEPTION
- SCIENCE
- aspartame
- azo dyes
- regulation
- risk communication
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The changing Nature of Regulation and Communication of Risk in Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver