TY - UNPB
T1 - The Brain Tumor Segmentation - Metastases (BraTS-METS) Challenge 2023
T2 - Brain Metastasis Segmentation on Pre-treatment MRI
AU - Moawad, Ahmed W
AU - Janas, Anastasia
AU - Baid, Ujjwal
AU - Ramakrishnan, Divya
AU - Saluja, Rachit
AU - Ashraf, Nader
AU - Jekel, Leon
AU - Amiruddin, Raisa
AU - Adewole, Maruf
AU - Albrecht, Jake
AU - Anazodo, Udunna
AU - Aneja, Sanjay
AU - Anwar, Syed Muhammad
AU - Bergquist, Timothy
AU - Calabrese, Evan
AU - Chiang, Veronica
AU - Chung, Verena
AU - Conte, Gian Marco Marco
AU - Dako, Farouk
AU - Eddy, James
AU - Ezhov, Ivan
AU - Familiar, Ariana
AU - Farahani, Keyvan
AU - Iglesias, Juan Eugenio
AU - Jiang, Zhifan
AU - Johanson, Elaine
AU - Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi
AU - Kofler, Florian
AU - Krantchev, Kiril
AU - LaBella, Dominic
AU - Van Leemput, Koen
AU - Li, Hongwei Bran
AU - Linguraru, Marius George
AU - Link, Katherine E
AU - Liu, Xinyang
AU - Maleki, Nazanin
AU - Meier, Zeke
AU - Menze, Bjoern H
AU - Moy, Harrison
AU - Osenberg, Klara
AU - Piraud, Marie
AU - Reitman, Zachary
AU - Shinohara, Russel Takeshi
AU - Tahon, Nourel Hoda
AU - Nada, Ayman
AU - Velichko, Yuri S
AU - Wang, Chunhao
AU - Wiestler, Benedikt
AU - Wiggins, Walter
AU - Postma, Alida A
AU - Author collaboration
PY - 2024/6/17
Y1 - 2024/6/17
N2 - The translation of AI-generated brain metastases (BM) segmentation into clinical practice relies heavily on diverse, high-quality annotated medical imaging datasets. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge has gained momentum for testing and benchmarking algorithms using rigorously annotated internationally compiled real-world datasets. This study presents the results of the segmentation challenge and characterizes the challenging cases that impacted the performance of the winning algorithms. Untreated brain metastases on standard anatomic MRI sequences (T1, T2, FLAIR, T1PG) from eight contributed international datasets were annotated in stepwise method: published UNET algorithms, student, neuroradiologist, final approver neuroradiologist. Segmentations were ranked based on lesion-wise Dice and Hausdorff distance (HD95) scores. False positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) were rigorously penalized, receiving a score of 0 for Dice and a fixed penalty of 374 for HD95. The mean scores for the teams were calculated. Eight datasets comprising 1303 studies were annotated, with 402 studies (3076 lesions) released on Synapse as publicly available datasets to challenge competitors. Additionally, 31 studies (139 lesions) were held out for validation, and 59 studies (218 lesions) were used for testing. Segmentation accuracy was measured as rank across subjects, with the winning team achieving a LesionWise mean score of 7.9. The Dice score for the winning team was 0.65 ± 0.25. Common errors among the leading teams included false negatives for small lesions and misregistration of masks in space. The Dice scores and lesion detection rates of all algorithms diminished with decreasing tumor size, particularly for tumors smaller than 100 mm3. In conclusion, algorithms for BM segmentation require further refinement to balance high sensitivity in lesion detection with the minimization of false positives and negatives. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge successfully curated well-annotated, diverse datasets and identified common errors, facilitating the translation of BM segmentation across varied clinical environments and providing personalized volumetric reports to patients undergoing BM treatment.
AB - The translation of AI-generated brain metastases (BM) segmentation into clinical practice relies heavily on diverse, high-quality annotated medical imaging datasets. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge has gained momentum for testing and benchmarking algorithms using rigorously annotated internationally compiled real-world datasets. This study presents the results of the segmentation challenge and characterizes the challenging cases that impacted the performance of the winning algorithms. Untreated brain metastases on standard anatomic MRI sequences (T1, T2, FLAIR, T1PG) from eight contributed international datasets were annotated in stepwise method: published UNET algorithms, student, neuroradiologist, final approver neuroradiologist. Segmentations were ranked based on lesion-wise Dice and Hausdorff distance (HD95) scores. False positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) were rigorously penalized, receiving a score of 0 for Dice and a fixed penalty of 374 for HD95. The mean scores for the teams were calculated. Eight datasets comprising 1303 studies were annotated, with 402 studies (3076 lesions) released on Synapse as publicly available datasets to challenge competitors. Additionally, 31 studies (139 lesions) were held out for validation, and 59 studies (218 lesions) were used for testing. Segmentation accuracy was measured as rank across subjects, with the winning team achieving a LesionWise mean score of 7.9. The Dice score for the winning team was 0.65 ± 0.25. Common errors among the leading teams included false negatives for small lesions and misregistration of masks in space. The Dice scores and lesion detection rates of all algorithms diminished with decreasing tumor size, particularly for tumors smaller than 100 mm3. In conclusion, algorithms for BM segmentation require further refinement to balance high sensitivity in lesion detection with the minimization of false positives and negatives. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge successfully curated well-annotated, diverse datasets and identified common errors, facilitating the translation of BM segmentation across varied clinical environments and providing personalized volumetric reports to patients undergoing BM treatment.
U2 - 10.48550/arXiv.2306.00838
DO - 10.48550/arXiv.2306.00838
M3 - Preprint
C2 - 37396600
BT - The Brain Tumor Segmentation - Metastases (BraTS-METS) Challenge 2023
PB - Cornell University - arXiv
ER -