The best of both worlds? Effects of attribute-induced goal conflict on consumption of healthy indulgences

N.V.T. Belei-Bisping, K. Geyskens, C. Goukens, S. Ramanathan, J.G.A.M. Lemmink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Marketers commonly assume that health claims attached to otherwise unhealthful food stimulate consumption because such claims offer justification for indulgence and reduce guilt. This article proposes a generalized theory of healthful indulgences, identifying when and why people overconsume versus regulate food intake in response to health claims. Four studies demonstrate that not all health claims are created equal. The authors suggest that the nature of the food attributes the claims emphasize namely, functional versus hedonic determines the extent of consumption of the indulgence. Health claims featuring functional attributes (e.g., "extra antioxidants") trigger high levels of health-goal accessibility, which, together with simultaneously accessible indulgence goals attached to the indulgence, results in goal conflict. This conflict leads to reduced consumption of the food. In contrast, health claims featuring hedonic attributes (e.g., "low fat") render health goals less accessible while accentuating the pleasure dimension of the food, resulting in lower goal conflict and increased consumption of the food. Implications for the food industry and public policy makers are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)900-909
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Marketing Research
Volume49
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012

Keywords

  • health claims
  • goal conflict
  • self-control
  • consumption
  • CONSUMER CHOICE
  • FOOD
  • OBESITY
  • FULFILLMENT
  • ACTIVATION
  • TEMPTATION
  • JUDGMENTS
  • EMOTIONS
  • VIRTUES
  • CLAIMS

Cite this

@article{2aae1b240c914844ad980cddd514f713,
title = "The best of both worlds? Effects of attribute-induced goal conflict on consumption of healthy indulgences",
abstract = "Marketers commonly assume that health claims attached to otherwise unhealthful food stimulate consumption because such claims offer justification for indulgence and reduce guilt. This article proposes a generalized theory of healthful indulgences, identifying when and why people overconsume versus regulate food intake in response to health claims. Four studies demonstrate that not all health claims are created equal. The authors suggest that the nature of the food attributes the claims emphasize namely, functional versus hedonic determines the extent of consumption of the indulgence. Health claims featuring functional attributes (e.g., {"}extra antioxidants{"}) trigger high levels of health-goal accessibility, which, together with simultaneously accessible indulgence goals attached to the indulgence, results in goal conflict. This conflict leads to reduced consumption of the food. In contrast, health claims featuring hedonic attributes (e.g., {"}low fat{"}) render health goals less accessible while accentuating the pleasure dimension of the food, resulting in lower goal conflict and increased consumption of the food. Implications for the food industry and public policy makers are discussed.",
keywords = "health claims, goal conflict, self-control, consumption, CONSUMER CHOICE, FOOD, OBESITY, FULFILLMENT, ACTIVATION, TEMPTATION, JUDGMENTS, EMOTIONS, VIRTUES, CLAIMS",
author = "N.V.T. Belei-Bisping and K. Geyskens and C. Goukens and S. Ramanathan and J.G.A.M. Lemmink",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1509/jmr.10.0155",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "900--909",
journal = "Journal of Marketing Research",
issn = "0022-2437",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

The best of both worlds? Effects of attribute-induced goal conflict on consumption of healthy indulgences. / Belei-Bisping, N.V.T.; Geyskens, K.; Goukens, C.; Ramanathan, S.; Lemmink, J.G.A.M.

In: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 49, No. 6, 12.2012, p. 900-909.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The best of both worlds? Effects of attribute-induced goal conflict on consumption of healthy indulgences

AU - Belei-Bisping, N.V.T.

AU - Geyskens, K.

AU - Goukens, C.

AU - Ramanathan, S.

AU - Lemmink, J.G.A.M.

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Marketers commonly assume that health claims attached to otherwise unhealthful food stimulate consumption because such claims offer justification for indulgence and reduce guilt. This article proposes a generalized theory of healthful indulgences, identifying when and why people overconsume versus regulate food intake in response to health claims. Four studies demonstrate that not all health claims are created equal. The authors suggest that the nature of the food attributes the claims emphasize namely, functional versus hedonic determines the extent of consumption of the indulgence. Health claims featuring functional attributes (e.g., "extra antioxidants") trigger high levels of health-goal accessibility, which, together with simultaneously accessible indulgence goals attached to the indulgence, results in goal conflict. This conflict leads to reduced consumption of the food. In contrast, health claims featuring hedonic attributes (e.g., "low fat") render health goals less accessible while accentuating the pleasure dimension of the food, resulting in lower goal conflict and increased consumption of the food. Implications for the food industry and public policy makers are discussed.

AB - Marketers commonly assume that health claims attached to otherwise unhealthful food stimulate consumption because such claims offer justification for indulgence and reduce guilt. This article proposes a generalized theory of healthful indulgences, identifying when and why people overconsume versus regulate food intake in response to health claims. Four studies demonstrate that not all health claims are created equal. The authors suggest that the nature of the food attributes the claims emphasize namely, functional versus hedonic determines the extent of consumption of the indulgence. Health claims featuring functional attributes (e.g., "extra antioxidants") trigger high levels of health-goal accessibility, which, together with simultaneously accessible indulgence goals attached to the indulgence, results in goal conflict. This conflict leads to reduced consumption of the food. In contrast, health claims featuring hedonic attributes (e.g., "low fat") render health goals less accessible while accentuating the pleasure dimension of the food, resulting in lower goal conflict and increased consumption of the food. Implications for the food industry and public policy makers are discussed.

KW - health claims

KW - goal conflict

KW - self-control

KW - consumption

KW - CONSUMER CHOICE

KW - FOOD

KW - OBESITY

KW - FULFILLMENT

KW - ACTIVATION

KW - TEMPTATION

KW - JUDGMENTS

KW - EMOTIONS

KW - VIRTUES

KW - CLAIMS

U2 - 10.1509/jmr.10.0155

DO - 10.1509/jmr.10.0155

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 900

EP - 909

JO - Journal of Marketing Research

JF - Journal of Marketing Research

SN - 0022-2437

IS - 6

ER -