The association of physical deconditioning and chronic low back pain: a hypothesis-oriented systematic review.

R.J.E.M. Smeets, D. Wade, A. Hidding, P.J. Van Leeuwen, J.W.S. Vlaeyen, J.A. Knottnerus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. Does physical deconditioning ( loss of cardiovascular capacity and strength/endurance of paraspinal muscles) exist in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and are treatments specifically aimed to reduce these signs effective? Method. Systematic literature search in PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO until December 2004 to identify observational studies regarding deconditioning signs and high quality RCTs regarding the effectiveness of cardiovascular and/or muscle strengthening exercises. Internal validity of the RCTs was assessed by using a checklist of nine methodology criteria in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration. Results. There is conflicting evidence that cardiovascular deconditioning is present in CLBP and limited evidence for wasting of the multifidus muscle. No study examined the effectiveness of cardiovascular training specifically. General and lumbar muscle strengthening are equally effective as other active treatments. Only moderate evidence is available for the effectiveness of intensive low back extensor muscle strengthening compared to less intensive strengthening. Conclusion. Probably reactivation caused by active treatment and not the reconditioning itself is the important factor in the reduction of disability. Further prospective and evaluative research into the role of physical deconditioning is necessary. It seems more promising to further explore the interplay between biological, social and psychological factors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)673-693
JournalDisability and Rehabilitation
Volume28
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2006

Cite this

@article{28791374925c43ed86ac8b1c5d640b4c,
title = "The association of physical deconditioning and chronic low back pain: a hypothesis-oriented systematic review.",
abstract = "Purpose. Does physical deconditioning ( loss of cardiovascular capacity and strength/endurance of paraspinal muscles) exist in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and are treatments specifically aimed to reduce these signs effective? Method. Systematic literature search in PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO until December 2004 to identify observational studies regarding deconditioning signs and high quality RCTs regarding the effectiveness of cardiovascular and/or muscle strengthening exercises. Internal validity of the RCTs was assessed by using a checklist of nine methodology criteria in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration. Results. There is conflicting evidence that cardiovascular deconditioning is present in CLBP and limited evidence for wasting of the multifidus muscle. No study examined the effectiveness of cardiovascular training specifically. General and lumbar muscle strengthening are equally effective as other active treatments. Only moderate evidence is available for the effectiveness of intensive low back extensor muscle strengthening compared to less intensive strengthening. Conclusion. Probably reactivation caused by active treatment and not the reconditioning itself is the important factor in the reduction of disability. Further prospective and evaluative research into the role of physical deconditioning is necessary. It seems more promising to further explore the interplay between biological, social and psychological factors.",
author = "R.J.E.M. Smeets and D. Wade and A. Hidding and {Van Leeuwen}, P.J. and J.W.S. Vlaeyen and J.A. Knottnerus",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09638280500264782",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "673--693",
journal = "Disability and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0963-8288",
publisher = "Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "11",

}

The association of physical deconditioning and chronic low back pain: a hypothesis-oriented systematic review. / Smeets, R.J.E.M.; Wade, D.; Hidding, A.; Van Leeuwen, P.J.; Vlaeyen, J.W.S.; Knottnerus, J.A.

In: Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 28, No. 11, 01.01.2006, p. 673-693.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The association of physical deconditioning and chronic low back pain: a hypothesis-oriented systematic review.

AU - Smeets, R.J.E.M.

AU - Wade, D.

AU - Hidding, A.

AU - Van Leeuwen, P.J.

AU - Vlaeyen, J.W.S.

AU - Knottnerus, J.A.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Purpose. Does physical deconditioning ( loss of cardiovascular capacity and strength/endurance of paraspinal muscles) exist in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and are treatments specifically aimed to reduce these signs effective? Method. Systematic literature search in PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO until December 2004 to identify observational studies regarding deconditioning signs and high quality RCTs regarding the effectiveness of cardiovascular and/or muscle strengthening exercises. Internal validity of the RCTs was assessed by using a checklist of nine methodology criteria in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration. Results. There is conflicting evidence that cardiovascular deconditioning is present in CLBP and limited evidence for wasting of the multifidus muscle. No study examined the effectiveness of cardiovascular training specifically. General and lumbar muscle strengthening are equally effective as other active treatments. Only moderate evidence is available for the effectiveness of intensive low back extensor muscle strengthening compared to less intensive strengthening. Conclusion. Probably reactivation caused by active treatment and not the reconditioning itself is the important factor in the reduction of disability. Further prospective and evaluative research into the role of physical deconditioning is necessary. It seems more promising to further explore the interplay between biological, social and psychological factors.

AB - Purpose. Does physical deconditioning ( loss of cardiovascular capacity and strength/endurance of paraspinal muscles) exist in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and are treatments specifically aimed to reduce these signs effective? Method. Systematic literature search in PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO until December 2004 to identify observational studies regarding deconditioning signs and high quality RCTs regarding the effectiveness of cardiovascular and/or muscle strengthening exercises. Internal validity of the RCTs was assessed by using a checklist of nine methodology criteria in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration. Results. There is conflicting evidence that cardiovascular deconditioning is present in CLBP and limited evidence for wasting of the multifidus muscle. No study examined the effectiveness of cardiovascular training specifically. General and lumbar muscle strengthening are equally effective as other active treatments. Only moderate evidence is available for the effectiveness of intensive low back extensor muscle strengthening compared to less intensive strengthening. Conclusion. Probably reactivation caused by active treatment and not the reconditioning itself is the important factor in the reduction of disability. Further prospective and evaluative research into the role of physical deconditioning is necessary. It seems more promising to further explore the interplay between biological, social and psychological factors.

U2 - 10.1080/09638280500264782

DO - 10.1080/09638280500264782

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 673

EP - 693

JO - Disability and Rehabilitation

JF - Disability and Rehabilitation

SN - 0963-8288

IS - 11

ER -