The Association between Self-Reported Self-Disturbance Phenomena and Personal Recovery in Patients with a Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder, Siblings, and Controls

  • Auke Jelsma*
  • , Stephanie Dijkstra
  • , Sietske Wiemer
  • , Astrid Vellinga
  • , Mariken de Koning
  • , Wiepke Cahn
  • , Claudia Simons
  • , Marieke van der Pluijm
  • , Lieuwe de Haan
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

– Introduction: Self-disturbance phenomena are increasingly recognized as fundamental and debilitating features for patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD). The concept of personal recovery describes the process of building a meaningful and satisfying life despite persistent symptoms or challenges related to mental illness. No previous study has investigated the association between self-disturbance phenomena and personal recovery in patients with SSD. Understanding the impact of self-disturbance could strengthen the therapeutic alliance with patients and contribute to the development of treatment strategies supporting their recovery. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate whether severity of self-reported self-disturbance phenomena is associated with the level of self-reported personal recovery in patients with SSD, their unaffected siblings, and healthy controls. Methods: In a cross-sectional design with 522 patients with SSD, 608 unaffected siblings, and 369 healthy controls, the frequency and distress of self-disturbance phenomena was measured with the Self-Experience Lifetime Frequency Scale (SELF). Personal recovery was assessed with the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS-24). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between both scales were examined. Subsequent multiple hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to assess additional explained variance in personal recovery by severity of self-disturbance phenomena, adjusting for positive, negative, and general symptomatology. Results: Significant correlations were reported between higher SELF and lower RAS-24 scores for patients (ρ = −0.20, p < 0.001), siblings (ρ = −0.24, p < 0.001), and controls (ρ = −0.16, p < 0.005). The severity of self-disturbance phenomena significantly albeit modestly predicted total personal recovery score after adjusting for positive, negative, and general symptoms for patients (R 2 change = 0.035, β = −0.19, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Current findings suggest that self-reported self-disturbance phenomena are relevant for the personal recovery of patients with SSD. Healthcare practitioners are urged for attention to patients’ first-person perspectives, including experiences of self-disturbance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)277-288
Number of pages12
JournalPsychopathology
Volume58
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2025

Keywords

  • Self-disturbance phenomena
  • Subjective experiences
  • Personal recovery
  • Schizophrenia spectrum disorders
  • Psychotic disorders
  • UNAFFECTED SIBLINGS
  • PSYCHOSIS
  • EXPERIENCE
  • RELIABILITY
  • SYMPTOMS
  • VALIDITY
  • SCALE
  • RISK
  • PSYCHOPATHOLOGY
  • ADOLESCENTS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Association between Self-Reported Self-Disturbance Phenomena and Personal Recovery in Patients with a Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder, Siblings, and Controls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this