Abstract
Predatory journals and conferences are an emerging problem in scientific literature as they have financial motives, without guaranteeing scientific quality and exposure. The main objective of the ASGLOS project is to investigate the predatory e-email characteristics, management, and possible consequences and to analyse the extent of the current problem at each academic level. To collect the personal experiences of physicians' mailboxes on predatory publishing, a Google Form & REG; survey was designed and disseminated from September 2021 to April 2022. A total of 978 responses were analysed from 58 countries around the world. A total of 64.8% of participants indicated the need for 3 or fewer emails to acquire a criticality view in distinguishing a real invitation from a spam, while 11.5% still have doubt regardless of how many emails they get. The AGLOS Study clearly highlights the problem of academic e-mail spam by predatory journals and conferences. Our findings signify the importance of providing academic career-oriented advice and organising training sessions to increase awareness of predatory publishing for those conducting scientific research.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 207-216 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Developing World Bioethics |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | Aug 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2024 |
Keywords
- academic spam
- electronic mail
- predatory journal
- survey
- time management