The Age-Old Distinction Between Public and Private Limited Liability Companies: Should It Stay or Should It Go?: A figment of academics' imaginations

H.P.E. Van Delft*, S. Renssen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article attempts to answer the question whether the distinction between public and private companies is still needed or whether it is outdated. The question will be answered from an EU perspective, while taking the Dutch legal system as a leading example. In the Netherlands, there was a huge time-gap between the introduction of the public company in 1811 and the introduction of the private company in 1971, 160 years later. This seems to justify the question whether we needed the private company at all.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-22
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Company Law
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2023

Keywords

  • public company
  • private company
  • minimum capital requirement
  • capital maintenance rules
  • bearer shares
  • registered shares

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Age-Old Distinction Between Public and Private Limited Liability Companies: Should It Stay or Should It Go?: A figment of academics' imaginations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this