The additional value of the CRP test in patients in whom the primary care physician excluded pulmonary embolism

Wim A. M. Lucassen*, Marlous Kuijs-Augustijn, Petra M. G. Erkens, Geert-Jan Geersing, Harry R. Buller, Henk C. P. M. van Weert

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

After excluding pulmonary embolism (PE) with an unlikely Wells-decision rule and a negative D-dimer test, the general practitioner still has to differentiate between clinically relevant and clinically non-relevant diseases accounting for the presented symptoms. A negative D-dimer test makes clinically relevant disease less likely. The C-reactive protein (CRP) test could be of additional value to make this differentiation. Objectives: To assess whether an unlikely Wells-decision rule in combination with a negative point of care D-dimer test not only can safely exclude PE but also, in combination with a negative CRP-test, any other clinically relevant disease. Methods: We used data of a prospective study including 598 primary care patients suspected of pulmonary embolism. We included all patients, referred to secondary care for reference testing, with an unlikely Wells-decision rule and a negative point of care D-dimer test. We included 191 patients and imputed the CRP-test results in 60 patients. Alternative diagnoses were divided in clinically relevant diseases and clinically non-relevant diseases. A ROC-curve was constructed to determine the optimal CRP-cut-off. Results: The optimal CRP cut-off value appeared to be 10 mg/l. A total of 116 patients had a CRP <10 mg/l of whom 12 patients (10%) had a clinically relevant disease. Two patients (2%) needed hospital admission. A total of 75 patients had a CRP <10 mg/l of whom 32 patients (43%) had a clinically relevant disease. Fifteen patients (20%) were admitted to hospital. Conclusion: The CRP-test is enhancing diagnostic decision making in patients in whom the general practitioner excluded PE.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-149
JournalEuropean Journal of General Practice
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2013

Keywords

  • CRP-test
  • pulmonary embolism
  • D-dimer test
  • Wells-decision rule
  • sensitivity and specificity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The additional value of the CRP test in patients in whom the primary care physician excluded pulmonary embolism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this