TY - JOUR
T1 - The added value of SLN mapping with indocyanine green in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer management
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Burg, Lara C
AU - Verheijen, Shenna
AU - Bekkers, Ruud L M
AU - IntHout, Joanna
AU - Holloway, Robert W
AU - Taskin, Salih
AU - Ferguson, Sarah E
AU - Xue, Yu
AU - Ditto, Antonino
AU - Baiocchi, Glauco
AU - Papadia, Andrea
AU - Bogani, Giorgio
AU - Buda, Alessandro
AU - Kruitwagen, Roy F P M
AU - Zusterzeel, Petra L M
N1 - Copyright © 2022. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the SLN detection rate in presumed early stage, low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancers, the incidence of SLN metastases, and the negative predictive value of SLN mapping performed with indocyanine green (ICG).METHODS: A systematic review with meta-analyses was conducted. Study inclusion criteria were A) low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer, B) the use of ICG per cervical injection; C) a minimum of twenty included patients per study. To assess the negative predictive value of SLN mapping, D) a subsequent lymphadenectomy was an additional inclusion criterion.RESULTS: Fourteen studies were selected, involving 2,117 patients. The overall and bilateral SLN detection rates were 95.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]=92.4%-97.9%) and 76.5% (95% CI=68.1%-84.0%), respectively. The incidence of SLN metastases was 9.6% (95% CI=5.1%-15.2%) in patients with grade 1-2 endometrial cancer and 11.8% (95% CI=8.1%-16.1%) in patients with grade 1-3 endometrial cancer. The negative predictive value of SLN mapping was 100% (95% CI=98.8%-100%) in studies that included grade 1-2 endometrial cancer and 99.2% (95% CI=97.9%-99.9%) in studies that also included grade 3.CONCLUSION: SLN mapping with ICG is feasible with a high detection rate and negative predictive value in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancers. Given the incidence of SLN metastases is approximately 10% in those patients, SLN mapping may lead to stage shifting with potential therapeutic consequences. Given the high negative predictive value with SLN mapping, routine lymphadenectomy should be omitted in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.
AB - OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the SLN detection rate in presumed early stage, low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancers, the incidence of SLN metastases, and the negative predictive value of SLN mapping performed with indocyanine green (ICG).METHODS: A systematic review with meta-analyses was conducted. Study inclusion criteria were A) low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer, B) the use of ICG per cervical injection; C) a minimum of twenty included patients per study. To assess the negative predictive value of SLN mapping, D) a subsequent lymphadenectomy was an additional inclusion criterion.RESULTS: Fourteen studies were selected, involving 2,117 patients. The overall and bilateral SLN detection rates were 95.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]=92.4%-97.9%) and 76.5% (95% CI=68.1%-84.0%), respectively. The incidence of SLN metastases was 9.6% (95% CI=5.1%-15.2%) in patients with grade 1-2 endometrial cancer and 11.8% (95% CI=8.1%-16.1%) in patients with grade 1-3 endometrial cancer. The negative predictive value of SLN mapping was 100% (95% CI=98.8%-100%) in studies that included grade 1-2 endometrial cancer and 99.2% (95% CI=97.9%-99.9%) in studies that also included grade 3.CONCLUSION: SLN mapping with ICG is feasible with a high detection rate and negative predictive value in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancers. Given the incidence of SLN metastases is approximately 10% in those patients, SLN mapping may lead to stage shifting with potential therapeutic consequences. Given the high negative predictive value with SLN mapping, routine lymphadenectomy should be omitted in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.
U2 - 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e66
DO - 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e66
M3 - (Systematic) Review article
C2 - 35882605
SN - 2005-0380
VL - 33
JO - Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
IS - 5
M1 - e66
ER -