Abstract
Persons with intellectual disabilities (ID) may have difficulties providing reliable and valid accounts of their personal experiences through self-report measures. The aim of the current study was to systematically review the peer-reviewed research literature on the adaptations needed to develop “ID-inclusive” self-report measures. A search of PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar identified 49 studies that met inclusion criteria. A GRADE-CERQual assessment was performed to determine the level of confidence in the review findings. One hundred sixty-one recommendations for the development of “ID-inclusive” self-report measures were extracted from 49 included studies. Recommendations were presented in a GRADE-CERQual Summary of Findings table, according to a five-stage model of instrument development. This review offers much-needed practical guidance for clinicians and researchers on how to develop “ID-inclusive” self-report measures. Recommendations for future research about selfreport instrument development for use with people with ID are presented.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 250-271 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Clinical Psychology-Science and Practice |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 3 Feb 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2022 |
Keywords
- ACQUIESCENCE
- ADULTS
- CHILDREN
- HEALTH
- LEARNING-DISABILITY
- METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES
- MILD
- PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
- QUALITY-OF-LIFE
- RATING ANXIETY SCALE
- intellectual disabilities
- interviews
- psychometrics
- questionnaires
- self-report
- Intellectual disabilities
- Psychometrics
- Self-report
- Questionnaires
- Interviews
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Adaptation of Self-Report Measures to the Needs of People With Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver