Textbook Outcome: Nationwide Analysis of a Novel Quality Measure in Pancreatic Surgery

S. van Roessel, T.M. Mackay, S. van Dieren, G.P. van der Schelling, V.B. Nieuwenhutjs, K. Bosscha, E. van der Harst, R.M. van Dam, M.S.L. Liem, S. Festen, M.W.J. Stommel, D. Roos, F. Wit, I.Q. Molenaar, V.E. de Meijer, G. Kazemier, I.H.J.T. de Hingh, H.C. van Santvoort, B.A. Bonsing, O.R. BuschB.G. Koerkamp, M.G. Besselink*, Dutch Pancreatic Canc Grp

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Background: Textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional measure for quality assurance, reflecting the "ideal" surgical outcome. Methods: Post-hoc analysis of patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) for all indications between 2014 and 2017, queried from the nationwide prospective Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit. An international survey was conducted among 24 experts from 10 countries to reach consensus on the requirements for TO in pancreatic surgery. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify TO predictors. Between-hospital variation in TO rates was compared using observed-versus-expected rates. Results: Based on the survey (92% response rate), TO was defined by the absence of postoperative pancreatic fistula, bile leak, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (all ISGPS grade B/C), severe complications (Clavien-Dindo >= III), readmission, and in-hospital mortality. Overall, 3341 patients were included (2633 (79%) PD and 708 (21%) DP) of whom 60.3% achieved TO; 58.3% for PD and 67.4% for DP. On multivariable analysis, ASA class 3 predicted a worse TO rate after PD (ASA 3 OR 0.59 [0.44-0.80]), whereas a dilated pancreatic duct (>3 mm) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were associated with a better TO rate (OR 2.22 [2.05-3.57] and OR 1.36 [1.14-1.63], respectively). For DP, female sex and the absence of neoadjuvant therapy predicted better TO rates (OR 1.38 [1.01-1.90] and OR 2.53 [1.20-5.31], respectively). When comparing institutions, the observed-versus-expected rate for achieving TO varied from 0.71 to 1.46 per hospital after casemix-adjustment. Conclusions: TO is a novel quality measure in pancreatic surgery. TO varies considerably between pancreatic centers, demonstrating the potential benefit of quality assurance programs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-162
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020


  • auditing
  • care
  • classification
  • composite-measure
  • fistula
  • germany
  • in-hospital mortality
  • indicators
  • international study-group
  • major complications
  • margin status
  • outcomes
  • pancreatic surgery
  • practice variation
  • surgery
  • textbook outcome
  • CARE

Cite this