Testing the convergence hypothesis: A comment

Martin Carree*, Luuk Klomp

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    1 Downloads (Pure)


    In a recent paper Lichtenberg (1994) proposes a test of the convergence hypothesis that the variance of productivity across countries decreases over time. He argues that the ratio of the variance in the first period to that in the last period of the time series is F-distributed bur overlooks the dependency between these two variances. As a consequence, probabilities of committing a type II error of incorrectly rejecting the convergence hypothesis are large. This problem manifests most strongly in short time periods. Lichtenberg, for example, rejects the convergence hypothesis for a data set of 22 OECD countries over the 1960-1985 period. Using two alternative test statistics, we claim that there is strong empirical evidence for convergence in that time period.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)683-686
    Number of pages4
    JournalReview of Economics and Statistics
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1997


    Dive into the research topics of 'Testing the convergence hypothesis: A comment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this