Test-retest reliability, construct validity and determinants of 6-minute walk test performance in adult patients with asthma

R Meys*, S M J Janssen, F M E Franssen, A W Vaes, A A F Stoffels, H W H van Hees, B van den Borst, P H Klijn, C Burtin, A J van 't Hul, M A Spruit

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Current knowledge regarding the measurement properties of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) in patients with asthma is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the test-retest reliability, measurement error and construct validity of the 6MWT and identify determinants of 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) in patients with asthma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: 201 asthma patients referred for pre-pulmonary rehabilitation assessment, were retrospectively analyzed (age 61±12 years, 42% male, FEV1 78±27% predicted). Patients performed two 6MWTs on subsequent days using a 30 m straight walking course. Other measurements included resting dyspnea, maximal exercise capacity, body composition, pulmonary function, pulmonary and quadriceps muscle strength and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Measurement error (absolute reliability) was tested using standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change at 95% confidence interval (MDC95%) and Bland and Altman 95% limits of agreement, whereas test-retest reliability (relative reliability) and construct validity were assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) and correlations, respectively.

RESULTS: The 6MWD showed excellent test-retest reliability (ICC2,1: 0.91). The mean change in 6MWD after the second 6MWT was 18m (95%CI 11-24m), with 73% of the patients walking further in the second test. The SEM and MDC95% for the 6MWT were 35 m and 98 m, respectively. The best 6MWD correlated strongly with peak oxygen uptake during CPET and resting dyspnea (r = 0.61-0.64) and had no-to-moderate correlations with body composition, pulmonary function, respiratory and quadriceps muscle strength and symptoms of anxiety and depression (r = 0.02-0.45). Multiple linear regression was able to identify maximal workload, BMI, rollator use, maximal expiratory pressure, FEV1 and DLCO as independent determinants of the best 6MWD (R2 = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS: The 6MWT was considered to be reliable and valid in patients with asthma, which strengthens its clinical utility. However, the majority of patients demonstrated a considerable learning effect in the second 6MWT, providing a strong rationale for performing two 6MWTs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)486-494
Number of pages9
JournalPulmonology
Volume29
Issue number6
Early online date2 Dec 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Test-retest reliability, construct validity and determinants of 6-minute walk test performance in adult patients with asthma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this