Temporal trends and variability of colonoscopy performance in a gastroenterology practice

Chantal le Clercq, R.J. Mooi, B. Winkens, B.N. Salden, C.M. Bakker, A.B. van Nunen, E.P. Keulen, R. de Ridder, Ad A.M. Masclee, S. Sanduleanu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and study aim: Quality measures for colonoscopy are operator dependent and vary. It is unclear whether quality measures change over time. In this study, time-dependent variation in colonoscopy performance was examined in a gastroenterology practice. Patients and methods: Colonoscopy and histopathology records that were collected at three hospitals (one university and two non-university hospitals) over three time periods (2007, 2010, and 2013) were reviewed. Data from colonoscopists performing at least 100 procedures per year were analyzed. Inter-colonoscopist variation in performance (i. e. adjusted cecal intubation rate [aCIR], adenoma detection rate [ADR], advanced ADR, mean adenomas per procedure [MAP], proximal ADR, nonpolypoid ADR, and serrated polyp detection rate) were examined using coefficients of variation. Logistic regression analyses were also performed, adjusting for covariates. Results: A total of 23 colonoscopists performing 6400 procedures were included. Overall, the mean aCIR, ADR, MAP, and proximal ADR improved significantly over time, from 91.9 %, 22.5 %, 0.37, and 10.2 % in 2007 to 95.3 %, 25.8 %, 0.45, and 13.4 %, respectively, in 2013 (P < 0.05). The inter-colonoscopist variation in ADR decreased from 37 % in 2007 to 15 % in 2013 (P < 0.05). In the non-university hospitals, mean values for quality measures increased significantly over time, whereas they remained stable in the university hospital. Conclusions: Variability in performance among colonoscopists decreased significantly within the gastroenterology clinical practice. Core quality measures improved over time, mainly through improvement of the lower performers. Measurement of inter-colonoscopist variation in performance helps to identify factors that stimulate or hinder performance, and forms the basis for interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.trialregister.nl.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)248-255
Number of pages8
JournalEndoscopy
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2016

Keywords

  • ADENOMA DETECTION RATE
  • COLORECTAL-CANCER
  • QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
  • TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE
  • DETECTION RATES
  • RISK
  • INDICATORS
  • ASSURANCE
  • SOCIETY

Cite this