Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Task Performance of Social Workers Declines Under Verbal Aggression: A Scenario Study

  • Niek Maassen*
  • , Yannick Hill
  • , Peter G. Renden
  • , Bauke Koekkoek
  • , Manon Biesebroek
  • , Raoul R. D. Oudejans
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: Social workers frequently face verbal aggression. While most studies have focused on long-term consequences of these encounters, this study examined how verbal aggression influences perceived acute stress and behavioral performance in social workers during these situations.Method: Twenty-seven participants engaged in scenarios with a trained actor portraying service user under either low or high verbal aggression conditions. Psychophysiological responses were measured during and following each scenario. Behavioral performance was evaluated by two experienced raters using a standardized checklist.Results: High verbal aggression elicited significantly higher cognitive and somatic anxiety, greater mental effort, increased heart rate, and reduced self-confidence compared to low aggression. Performance quality, including empathy and active listening, declined under high aggression.Conclusions: Exposure to verbal aggression heightens acute stress and impairs social workers' performance. Current training may be insufficient to mitigate these effects, as the trained skills degrade under pressure.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages11
JournalResearch on Social Work Practice
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2026

Keywords

  • de-escalation skills
  • behavioral performance
  • social work
  • perceived stress
  • mental effort
  • CHILD PROTECTION WORKERS
  • REALITY-BASED PRACTICE
  • VIOLENCE
  • CLIENT
  • ANXIETY
  • STRESS
  • SKILLS
  • IMPACT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Task Performance of Social Workers Declines Under Verbal Aggression: A Scenario Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this