Task Force Report: Scales for Screening and Evaluating Tremor Critique and Recommendations

Rodger Elble*, Peter Bain, Maria Joao Forjaz, Dietrich Haubenberger, Claudia Testa, Christopher G. Goetz, Albert F. G. Leentjens, Pablo Martinez-Martin, Anne Pavy-Le Traon, Bart Post, Cristina Sampaio, Glenn T. Stebbins, Daniel Weintraub, Anette Schrag

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The Movement Disorder Society established a task force to review rating scales for the assessment of tremor. Screening instruments used in identifying patients with tremor were also reviewed. Seven tremor severity scales, six activities of daily living (ADL)/disability scales, four quality-of-life scales, and five screening instruments were identified by searching PubMed.gov. The availability, use, acceptability, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change were reviewed for each scale; and each scale was classified as recommended, suggested or listed based on whether 3, 2, or 1 of the following criteria were met: (1) used in the assessment of tremor (yes/no), (2) used in published studies by people other than the developers (yes/no), and (3) successful clinimetric testing (yes/no). Five tremor severity scales (the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale, the Bain and Findley Clinical Tremor Rating Scale, the Bain and Findley Spirography Scale, the Washington Heights-Inwood Genetic Study of Essential Tremor Rating Scale, and the Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale), one ADL/disability scale (the Bain and Findley Tremor ADL Scale), one quality-of-life scale (the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire), and one screening instrument (the Washington Heights-Inwood Genetic Study of Essential Tremor Rating Scale, version 1) are recommended using these criteria. However, all scales need a more comprehensive analysis of sensitivity to change in order to judge their utility in clinical trials and individual patient assessments. The task force recommends that further work with existing recommended scales be performed as opposed to the development of new tremor scales.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1793-1800
JournalMovement Disorders
Volume28
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Keywords

  • tremor
  • rating scales
  • reliability
  • validity
  • sensitivity

Cite this