Taking constitutionalization one step too far? The need for revision of the Rheinmuehlen Case Law in the ligth of the AG opinion and hte ECJ's Ruling in Elchinov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)839-854
JournalEuropean Review of Public Law / Revue européenne de droit public
Volume23
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

Cite this

@article{48017d13953b48b09083b9e2fd1c9516,
title = "Taking constitutionalization one step too far? The need for revision of the Rheinmuehlen Case Law in the ligth of the AG opinion and hte ECJ's Ruling in Elchinov",
author = "M. Eliantonio and Ch.W. Backes",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "839--854",
journal = "European Review of Public Law / Revue europ{\'e}enne de droit public",
issn = "1105-1590",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taking constitutionalization one step too far? The need for revision of the Rheinmuehlen Case Law in the ligth of the AG opinion and hte ECJ's Ruling in Elchinov

AU - Eliantonio, M.

AU - Backes, Ch.W.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 839

EP - 854

JO - European Review of Public Law / Revue européenne de droit public

JF - European Review of Public Law / Revue européenne de droit public

SN - 1105-1590

IS - 3

ER -