Systematic analysis of F-18-FDG PET and metabolism, proliferation and hypoxia markers for classification of head and neck tumors

Bianca A. W. Hoeben*, Maud H. W. Starmans, Ralph T. H. Leijenaar, Ludwig J. Dubois, Albert J. van der Kogel, Johannes H. A. M. Kaanders, Paul C. Boutros, Philippe Lambin, Johan Bussink

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

16 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Background: Quantification of molecular cell processes is important for prognostication and treatment individualization of head and neck cancer (HNC). However, individual tumor comparison can show discord in upregulation similarities when analyzing multiple biological mechanisms. Elaborate tumor characterization, integrating multiple pathways reflecting intrinsic and microenvironmental properties, may be beneficial to group most uniform tumors for treatment modification schemes. The goal of this study was to systematically analyze if immunohistochemical (IHC) assessment of molecular markers, involved in treatment resistance, and F-18-FDG PET parameters could accurately distinguish separate HNC tumors. Methods: Several imaging parameters and texture features for F-18-FDG small-animal PET and immunohistochemical markers related to metabolism, hypoxia, proliferation and tumor blood perfusion were assessed within groups of BALB/c nu/nu mice xenografted with 14 human HNC models. Classification methods were used to predict tumor line based on sets of parameters. Results: We found that F-18-FDG PET could not differentiate between the tumor lines. On the contrary, combined IHC parameters could accurately allocate individual tumors to the correct model. From 9 analyzed IHC parameters, a cluster of 6 random parameters already classified 70.3% correctly. Combining all PET/IHC characteristics resulted in the highest tumor line classification accuracy (81.0%; cross validation 82.0%), which was just 2.2% higher (p = 5.2x10(-32)) than the performance of the IHC parameter/feature based model. Conclusions: With a select set of IHC markers representing cellular processes of metabolism, proliferation, hypoxia and perfusion, one can reliably distinguish between HNC tumor lines. Addition of F-18-FDG PET improves classification accuracy of IHC to a significant yet minor degree. These results may form a basis for development of tumor characterization models for treatment allocation purposes.
Original languageEnglish
Article number130
JournalBMC Cancer
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Feb 2014

Keywords

  • Head and neck cancer
  • Tumor characterization
  • F-18-FDG PET
  • Immunohistochemistry

Cite this