Symptom overreporting obscures the dose-response relationship between trauma severity and symptoms

H. Merckelbach, W. Langeland, G. de Vries, N. Draijer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated whether symptom overreporting affects the dose-response relationship between self-reported abuse severity and psychiatric symptoms in two samples. The first sample (N=599) consisted of adults who had previously reported to a public commission that they had been witnesses to or victims of childhood sexual abuse by Roman Catholic Church representatives. The second sample (N=1756) consisted of general population respondents who indicated that they had been victims of non-familial childhood sexual abuse. Using a web-based data collection procedure, both samples completed the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18), items addressing abuse severity, and items flagging symptom overreporting. Adjusting for overreporting reduced the proportion of participants with clinically raised BSI-18 scores from 60% to 47% in sample 1 and from 26% to 22% in sample 2. Also, in both samples, normal range reporting participants exhibited the typical dose-response relationship between trauma severity and BSI-18 scores, whereas this pattern was largely non-significant in overreporting participants. Our findings show that symptom overreporting has a psychometric impact that may obscure relationships between clinically relevant variables and should therefore preferably be monitored in surveys.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-219
Number of pages5
JournalPsychiatry Research
Volume217
Issue number3
Early online date24 Mar 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jul 2014

Keywords

  • Symptom overreporting
  • Trauma
  • Self-reports
  • Brief Symptom Inventory
  • POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER
  • SEXUAL-ABUSE
  • BIAS
  • EXAGGERATION
  • VALIDITY
  • SAMPLE
  • MEMORY

Cite this

Merckelbach, H. ; Langeland, W. ; de Vries, G. ; Draijer, N. / Symptom overreporting obscures the dose-response relationship between trauma severity and symptoms. In: Psychiatry Research. 2014 ; Vol. 217, No. 3. pp. 215-219.
@article{ad7f2bfad8b04b1eb4c3237c2f1a273d,
title = "Symptom overreporting obscures the dose-response relationship between trauma severity and symptoms",
abstract = "We investigated whether symptom overreporting affects the dose-response relationship between self-reported abuse severity and psychiatric symptoms in two samples. The first sample (N=599) consisted of adults who had previously reported to a public commission that they had been witnesses to or victims of childhood sexual abuse by Roman Catholic Church representatives. The second sample (N=1756) consisted of general population respondents who indicated that they had been victims of non-familial childhood sexual abuse. Using a web-based data collection procedure, both samples completed the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18), items addressing abuse severity, and items flagging symptom overreporting. Adjusting for overreporting reduced the proportion of participants with clinically raised BSI-18 scores from 60{\%} to 47{\%} in sample 1 and from 26{\%} to 22{\%} in sample 2. Also, in both samples, normal range reporting participants exhibited the typical dose-response relationship between trauma severity and BSI-18 scores, whereas this pattern was largely non-significant in overreporting participants. Our findings show that symptom overreporting has a psychometric impact that may obscure relationships between clinically relevant variables and should therefore preferably be monitored in surveys.",
keywords = "Symptom overreporting, Trauma, Self-reports, Brief Symptom Inventory, POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER, SEXUAL-ABUSE, BIAS, EXAGGERATION, VALIDITY, SAMPLE, MEMORY",
author = "H. Merckelbach and W. Langeland and {de Vries}, G. and N. Draijer",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychres.2014.03.018",
language = "English",
volume = "217",
pages = "215--219",
journal = "Psychiatry Research",
issn = "0165-1781",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Symptom overreporting obscures the dose-response relationship between trauma severity and symptoms. / Merckelbach, H.; Langeland, W.; de Vries, G.; Draijer, N.

In: Psychiatry Research, Vol. 217, No. 3, 30.07.2014, p. 215-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Symptom overreporting obscures the dose-response relationship between trauma severity and symptoms

AU - Merckelbach, H.

AU - Langeland, W.

AU - de Vries, G.

AU - Draijer, N.

PY - 2014/7/30

Y1 - 2014/7/30

N2 - We investigated whether symptom overreporting affects the dose-response relationship between self-reported abuse severity and psychiatric symptoms in two samples. The first sample (N=599) consisted of adults who had previously reported to a public commission that they had been witnesses to or victims of childhood sexual abuse by Roman Catholic Church representatives. The second sample (N=1756) consisted of general population respondents who indicated that they had been victims of non-familial childhood sexual abuse. Using a web-based data collection procedure, both samples completed the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18), items addressing abuse severity, and items flagging symptom overreporting. Adjusting for overreporting reduced the proportion of participants with clinically raised BSI-18 scores from 60% to 47% in sample 1 and from 26% to 22% in sample 2. Also, in both samples, normal range reporting participants exhibited the typical dose-response relationship between trauma severity and BSI-18 scores, whereas this pattern was largely non-significant in overreporting participants. Our findings show that symptom overreporting has a psychometric impact that may obscure relationships between clinically relevant variables and should therefore preferably be monitored in surveys.

AB - We investigated whether symptom overreporting affects the dose-response relationship between self-reported abuse severity and psychiatric symptoms in two samples. The first sample (N=599) consisted of adults who had previously reported to a public commission that they had been witnesses to or victims of childhood sexual abuse by Roman Catholic Church representatives. The second sample (N=1756) consisted of general population respondents who indicated that they had been victims of non-familial childhood sexual abuse. Using a web-based data collection procedure, both samples completed the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18), items addressing abuse severity, and items flagging symptom overreporting. Adjusting for overreporting reduced the proportion of participants with clinically raised BSI-18 scores from 60% to 47% in sample 1 and from 26% to 22% in sample 2. Also, in both samples, normal range reporting participants exhibited the typical dose-response relationship between trauma severity and BSI-18 scores, whereas this pattern was largely non-significant in overreporting participants. Our findings show that symptom overreporting has a psychometric impact that may obscure relationships between clinically relevant variables and should therefore preferably be monitored in surveys.

KW - Symptom overreporting

KW - Trauma

KW - Self-reports

KW - Brief Symptom Inventory

KW - POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER

KW - SEXUAL-ABUSE

KW - BIAS

KW - EXAGGERATION

KW - VALIDITY

KW - SAMPLE

KW - MEMORY

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.03.018

DO - 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.03.018

M3 - Article

VL - 217

SP - 215

EP - 219

JO - Psychiatry Research

JF - Psychiatry Research

SN - 0165-1781

IS - 3

ER -