Abstract
We discuss a phenomenon that has received little attention to date in research on dissociative phenomena, namely that self-reports of these phenomena overlap with the tendency to overendorse eccentric items. We review the literature documenting the dissociation-overreporting link and then briefly discuss various interpretations of this link: (1) overreporting is an artifact of measuring dissociative symptoms; (2) dissociative psychopathology engenders overreporting of eccentric symptoms through fantasy proneness or impairments in internal monitoring; (3) an overreporting response style as is evident in malingerers, for example, promotes reports of dissociative symptoms. These three interpretations are not mutually exclusive. Also, the dissociation-overreporting link may have different origins among different samples. Because overreporting may introduce noise in datasets, we need more research specifically aimed at disentangling the dissociation-overreporting link. We suggest various avenues to accomplish this goal.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 132-144 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Consciousness and Cognition |
Volume | 49 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2017 |
Keywords
- Alexithymia
- CAMBRIDGE DEPERSONALIZATION
- CLINICAL-IMPLICATIONS
- COLLEGE-STUDENTS
- COMBAT VETERANS
- COMPENSATION SEEKING
- Dissociative symptoms
- FANTASY PRONENESS
- Malingering
- Overreporting
- RESPONSE BIAS
- SCALE
- STRUCTURED-INVENTORY
- TRAUMA