Switching from an inclining to a zero-level unemployment benefit profile: Good for work incentives?

Bart Cockx, Koen Declercq, Muriel Dejemeppe*, Leda Inga, Bruno Van der Linden

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper evaluates the impact on the transition to work of a policy reform in Belgium that restricted the access to a specific unemployment insurance scheme for young labor market entrants. This scheme entitles youths with no or little labor market experience to unemployment benefits after a waiting period of one year. As of 2015, the Belgian government unexpectedly scrapped benefit eligibility for youths who start the waiting period at the age of 24 or older. The reform implied a change from an inclining to a flat rate (zero-level) benefit profile. We use a difference-in-differences approach to identify the causal impact of this reform on fresh university graduates. Our main finding is that this reform only increases the transition to very short-lived jobs.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101816
Number of pages13
JournalLabour Economics
Volume64
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2020
Externally publishedYes
Event31st Annual Conference of the European-Association-of-Labour-Economists (EALE) - Uppsala, Sweden
Duration: 19 Sept 201921 Sept 2019
Conference number: 31
https://www.ifau.se/en/Activities/Former-courses-and-conferences/eale-conference-2019/

JEL classifications

  • j64 - Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search
  • j65 - "Unemployment Insurance; Severance Pay; Plant Closings"
  • j68 - Mobility, Unemployment, and Vacancies: Public Policy

Keywords

  • Youth unemployment
  • Unemployment insurance
  • Policy evaluation
  • Difference-in-differences
  • POTENTIAL DURATION
  • MATCH QUALITY
  • INSURANCE
  • LIQUIDITY
  • JOBS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Switching from an inclining to a zero-level unemployment benefit profile: Good for work incentives?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this