Subsidiarity of the action for unjustified enrichment. French Law and Dutch Law: different solutions for the same problem

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	409-421
Journal	European Review of Private Law
Volume	14
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.54648/ERPL2006023
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2006

Access to Document

@article{a54d96cc68974781a799b21ad3b428d2,

title = "Subsidiarity of the action for unjustified enrichment. French Law and Dutch Law: different solutions for the same problem",

author = "\{van Maanen\}, G.E.",

year = "2006",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.54648/ERPL2006023",

language = "English",

volume = "14",

pages = "409--421",

journal = "European Review of Private Law",

issn = "0928-9801",

publisher = "Kluwer Law International",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subsidiarity of the action for unjustified enrichment. French Law and Dutch Law: different solutions for the same problem

AU - van Maanen, G.E.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

U2 - 10.54648/ERPL2006023

DO - 10.54648/ERPL2006023

M3 - Article

SN - 0928-9801

VL - 14

SP - 409

EP - 421

JO - European Review of Private Law

JF - European Review of Private Law

IS - 3

ER -