Subclinical dissociation, schizotypy and traumatic distress

H.L.G.J. Merckelbach, T.M. Giesbrecht

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)
165 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The current study looked at the overlap between dissociation and schizotypy and examined two potential sources from which this overlap might originate: fantasy proneness and traumatic distress. From a sample of 191 undergraduates, those scoring in the upper and lower quartile of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) were selected. Next, the scores of these groups on well-established schizotypy scales were compared to each other. The high-DES group had significantly higher schizotypy scores than the low-DES group. Although both groups also differed with regard to fantasy proneness and, to a lesser extent, traumatic distress, analyses of covariance showed that these variables could not explain group differences in schizotypy. Alternative interpretations of the dissociation-schizotypy link are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)365-374
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2006

Cite this

@article{572d3f6d74074cdba30350b3be6e9ef3,
title = "Subclinical dissociation, schizotypy and traumatic distress",
abstract = "The current study looked at the overlap between dissociation and schizotypy and examined two potential sources from which this overlap might originate: fantasy proneness and traumatic distress. From a sample of 191 undergraduates, those scoring in the upper and lower quartile of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) were selected. Next, the scores of these groups on well-established schizotypy scales were compared to each other. The high-DES group had significantly higher schizotypy scores than the low-DES group. Although both groups also differed with regard to fantasy proneness and, to a lesser extent, traumatic distress, analyses of covariance showed that these variables could not explain group differences in schizotypy. Alternative interpretations of the dissociation-schizotypy link are discussed.",
author = "H.L.G.J. Merckelbach and T.M. Giesbrecht",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.007",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "365--374",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "2",

}

Subclinical dissociation, schizotypy and traumatic distress. / Merckelbach, H.L.G.J.; Giesbrecht, T.M.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 40, No. 2, 01.01.2006, p. 365-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subclinical dissociation, schizotypy and traumatic distress

AU - Merckelbach, H.L.G.J.

AU - Giesbrecht, T.M.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - The current study looked at the overlap between dissociation and schizotypy and examined two potential sources from which this overlap might originate: fantasy proneness and traumatic distress. From a sample of 191 undergraduates, those scoring in the upper and lower quartile of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) were selected. Next, the scores of these groups on well-established schizotypy scales were compared to each other. The high-DES group had significantly higher schizotypy scores than the low-DES group. Although both groups also differed with regard to fantasy proneness and, to a lesser extent, traumatic distress, analyses of covariance showed that these variables could not explain group differences in schizotypy. Alternative interpretations of the dissociation-schizotypy link are discussed.

AB - The current study looked at the overlap between dissociation and schizotypy and examined two potential sources from which this overlap might originate: fantasy proneness and traumatic distress. From a sample of 191 undergraduates, those scoring in the upper and lower quartile of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) were selected. Next, the scores of these groups on well-established schizotypy scales were compared to each other. The high-DES group had significantly higher schizotypy scores than the low-DES group. Although both groups also differed with regard to fantasy proneness and, to a lesser extent, traumatic distress, analyses of covariance showed that these variables could not explain group differences in schizotypy. Alternative interpretations of the dissociation-schizotypy link are discussed.

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.007

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.007

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 365

EP - 374

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

IS - 2

ER -